Search for: "State v. S. R. R."
Results 601 - 620
of 71,790
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2011, 9:06 am
Perhaps in fear of the Supreme Court having a reduced role in criminal jurisprudence, the Court of Appeal’s refusal to certify a point was recently challenged in the case of R v James Lee Dunn. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 11:00 pm
R(on the application of Sayed) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R(on the application of Patel) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1059 – read judgment The Court of Appeal has confirmed that Article 8 of the Convention need not necessarily be considered when deciding whether to grant an applicant indefinite leave to remain. [read post]
23 May 2012, 8:34 am
On 22nd December 2010, H’s extradition was ordered by the Secretary of State, and the order and a letter setting out the Secretary of State’s reasons were sent by post and fax (at either 15.48 or 16.48) to H’s solicitors on that same day. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 5:56 am
S. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 12:18 pm
In Masimo Corporation v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 9:01 pm
United States (06-1164), asking whether the Tucker Act's six-year statute of limitations is jurisdictional (and may thus not be waived by the parties). [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 9:13 am
From her dissent in Tuesday's decision in Schuette v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 5:40 am
R. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 1:16 pm
S.C., Dec. 21, 2017, T.H. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:06 am
The Court of Appeal, relying on Lady Hale’s judgment in Humphreys v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2012] 1 WLR 1545, had considered that the case involved “discrimination in state benefits” and hence that the usually strict test for justification on grounds such as sex or disability gave way to the question of whether the Government’s approach was “manifestly without reasonable foundation”. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 9:00 pm
Lars R. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 7:30 am
State struck down California's tenure statutes and its last-in-first-out rules for layoffs. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 2:15 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Reckless, R (on the application of) v Kent Police Authority [2010] EWCA Civ 1277 (16 November 2010) Deman v The Commission for Equality and Human Rights & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1279 (16 November 2010) Ntuli v Donald [2010] EWCA Civ 1276 (16 November 2010) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Vaidya v General Medical Council [2010] EWHC 2873 (QB) (16 November 2010) Ifedha v Archant Regional Ltd… [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 1:28 pm
Sand & Gravel v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 4:51 pm
Matt Salmon (R) recently introduced a bill (pdf) that would remove several western states from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and move them to a proposed, to-be-created Twelfth Circuit. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 5:15 am
Schwartz firmly declaring the state's Education Savings Account (ESA) voucher program unconstitutional and permanently blocking its implementation. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 6:36 pm
State, in which school districts,... [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 11:54 pm
On ii), M submitted that the decision was unlawful, on the basis of R (S) v London Borough of Sutton [2007] EWHC 1196 (Admin) and R (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham [2008] 1 WLR. [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:58 pm
Relying on R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal [2011] UKSC 28, the majority noted that there is a strong interpretative presumption against the exclusion of judicial review, other than by “the most clear and explicit words” (Laws LJ in Cart at the Court of Appeal). [read post]
