Search for: "State v. Sample"
Results 601 - 620
of 4,172
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2014, 5:11 am
Elizabeth even provides a sample letter to the IRS. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 5:04 am
Woodall objected to the denial of his right to cross-examine, and informed the court that he intended to question the Technical Supervisor on the Intoxilyzer's ability to correlate the temperature of the breath sample. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 11:41 am
City of Chicago, which held that the right applies to state and local restrictions on firearms. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 8:07 am
by Dennis Crouch The Supreme Court has granted a petition for writ of certiorari in the pending patent case of Life Tech. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:52 am
State v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 4:00 am
The Case of the Day, Osorio v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 8:28 am
In Mata v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 8:42 am
Ed. 2d 610 (2011)(substitute chemist), and Williams v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 5:27 pm
Paraphrasing the Supreme Court’s decision in Riley v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 8:25 am
The post Use of Summons v. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 9:31 am
” The judge granted part of the order, stating that “[v]oting in a language you do not understand is like asking this Court decide the winner of the Nobel Prize for Chemistry—ineffective, in other words. [read post]
5 May 2008, 7:00 am
It’s not often that a Texas tax collection case achieves the status of a published decision by one of the State’s appellate courts, but that’s exactly what happened in Noorani Gas & Convenience, Inc., et al., v. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 7:34 pm
The samples indicated they did contain asbestos. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 2:56 am
U.S. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 3:00 am
Nichols v. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 3:00 am
Carranza v Nordstrom Inc., 2014 WL 10537816 (C. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 6:00 am
In Tyson Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 4:00 am
Back in June, I wrote about Kernel Records Oy v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 10:25 am
In 2015’s State v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 10:00 pm
Sentencing Commission’s empirical staff’s criticisms of their recent article, which found, contrary to the Commission’s prior work, no evidence that racial disparity in sentences increased in response to United States v. [read post]
