Search for: "State v. Sessions"
Results 601 - 620
of 5,709
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2024, 5:55 am
This session is part of a two-year process initiated by Resolution 77/249 of Nov. 18, 2022, which saw the convening of the first resumed session on Apr. 10-14, 2023. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 12:23 pm
The Court of Session: First Instance and Appeal The Outer House of the Court of Session ruled in favour of Landsbanki at first instance. [read post]
5 May 2022, 9:28 am
The case (Matal v. [read post]
10 Jan 2009, 9:00 pm
(Click here for the January session hearing list.) [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 6:20 pm
Texas, to find that a state court in 2008 unreasonably applied Atkins v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 8:57 am
In Philadelphia v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 10:43 am
The bill was in response to the Third Court’s decision in Freeman v. [read post]
25 May 2020, 12:46 pm
This series of consultations will be a complement to the discussions held during the fifth session of the OEIGWG; the two annexes of the report of the fifth session containing respectively a compilation of written statements and a compilation of the concrete textual suggestions presented by States during the fifth session; the additional textual suggestions on the draft legally binding instrument received until the end of February 2020, in accordance with… [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 11:44 am
New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 1:35 pm
Yesterday the Utah Supreme Court issued its ruling in the case of Southam v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 12:30 pm
Bank of Big Spring v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 3:43 am
This morning the Supreme Court wraps up its January session with oral arguments in two cases. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 4:54 pm
Mazer v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 3:46 am
Common Cause and Lamone v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 12:36 pm
In this case, Monteiro v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 10:05 am
With Jones v. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 7:13 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 1:03 pm
Sony v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 11:13 am
Bear in mind that the Lum case is completely different and separate from Kauai v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 3:15 am
However, the Supreme Court in the UK has previously held that the duty to provide a real opportunity for rehabilitation was an ancillary duty in the overall scheme of art 5 and existed throughout the prisoner’s detention (R (Kaiyam) v Secretary of State for Justice [2014] UKSC 66). [read post]
