Search for: "State v. South" Results 601 - 620 of 10,958
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2009, 6:51 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Fox v R. [2009] EWCA Crim 653 (02 April 2009) Pola v The Crown (Health and Safety Executive) [2009] EWCA Crim 655 (07 April 2009) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) South Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council, R (on the application of) v The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice & Anor [2009] EWCA [...] [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 9:01 pm by J. Benjamin Stevens
Smith, which applied the United States Supreme Court decision in Troxell v. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 1:13 pm by Naomi Shatz
Yee was a Chinese-American lieutenant for the State Police in Troop H, located in South Boston. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
There can be no doubt that media freedom in South Africa suffered some major blows in 2011, not least by the lower house of Parliament, the National Assembly, passing the Protection of State Information Bill, known in some quarters as the Secrecy Bill. [read post]
These additional states include Hawaii, Indiana, Kansas, Nebraska, Nevada, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Vermont, and Wisconsin. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 10:15 am by IPWatchdog
This week in Other Barks & Bites: China’s copyright office announces a 21% increase in copyright registrations between 2018 and 2019; Costa Rica asks WHO to build a voluntary patent pool for COVID-19 technologies, South Korea’s patent office builds a COVID-19 tech tracker; Amazon faces trademark infringement claims from NFL MVP Lamar Jackson and copyright infringement claims from Williams-Sonoma; Congress moves to pass a massive economic stimulus bill in response to… [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 6:00 am by Peter Vodola
" So said the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina (quoting Osprey, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 1:26 pm by Gregory Forman
  Though not incontrovertible, the 2003 United States Supreme Court decision in Lawrence v. [read post]