Search for: "State v. Stern " Results 601 - 620 of 972
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2013, 6:50 am by admin
Maxzone (Cartel Sentencing) In an important Federal Court decision issued in September, 2012 in the ongoing global auto parts price-fixing investigation (R. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 5:00 am by Will Bland
Last month the First Judicial District Court of Appeal for Illinois reached its opinion in Ballard v. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 9:55 am by Ron Coleman
Because he filed in state court, I can’t readily get the complaint as I could in a federal case. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 5:31 am
(For contemporary illustrations of this point, see the interpretation recently promulgated by Bishop Mark Lawrence, or the statement of Bishop Shaw on gay marriage in his diocese, or the court's decision in the Dixon v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 7:09 am by David Oscar Markus
Everyone else in Washington, DC and NY today is closed, except for the Supreme Court (and Howard Stern). [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 9:13 pm
Each post in this Year in Review series features a different federal courthouse in each state of the Union. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 8:59 pm
Each post in this Year in Review series features a different federal courthouse in each state of the Union. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 11:00 am by assoulineberlowe
Ortiz on September 6, 2012 · Posted in Jurisdiction,Stern Files COURTESY OF WEIL GOTSHAL & MANGES Bankruptcy Blog The Advisory Committee on Bankruptcy Rules for the Judicial Conference of the United States has proposed amendments to Bankruptcy Rules 7008, 7012, 7016, 9027, and 9033 in an attempt to address some of the inefficiencies that the Supreme Court’s Stern v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:29 pm
Each post in this Year in Review series will feature a different federal courthouse in each state of the Union. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 10:41 pm
JPM for pre-BK enhancement of position http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/Lehman-BK-SDNY-Peck-4-19-12.pdf … B-SDNY's Peck,J. in Lehman v. [read post]