Search for: "State v. Wells" Results 601 - 620 of 67,222
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2009, 11:00 am
United States, No. 08-8095, as well as the denial of rehearing in Ryan v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 3:30 am by Lumen N. Mulligan
While this process has led to a well-recognized loss of congressional control over federal-government processes, Rubenstein argues that it has led to a “leveling down” of state authority as well by (1) occupying areas of traditional state regulation, (2) undercutting spaces for cooperative federalism actions, and (3) outright federal preemption. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 2:51 pm by Kent Scheidegger
"  On remand, the state court can say, "Well, then, it violates provision Z of the state constitution, even though the state and federal  provisions are worded the same. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 1:10 am
Therefore, it is the well established law of this State that issues of credibility and the appropriate weight to give to a witness's testimony are for the jury, and it is impermissible, as a matter of law, for a witness to give an opinion on the credibility of another witness.At trial, petitioner was asked five "were-they-lying" questions. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 1:00 pm by Lauren Bateman
The transcript of Judge Edgardo Ramos’ Wednesday hearing in Restis v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 7:19 am by Woodruff Family Law Group
In the Tar Heel State, the unique legal doctrines of Alienation of Affection and Criminal Conversation are still very much alive and well. [read post]