Search for: "Stephens v. State Bar"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,667
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2008, 10:45 pm
Amid a fervent verbal duel over English and American legal history, between Justice Antonin Scalia and Justice Stephen G. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:28 am
” Kagan asked about a problem emphasized in the briefing, and described in my earlier posts on this case: that plaintiffs who rely on state court compensation mechanisms often find themselves barred from federal court under preclusion rules, a consequence the court itself explained in a case called San Remo Hotel v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 7:29 am
Lawyers for both sides in yesterday’s argument in Shapiro v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 11:42 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:44 pm
Stephens v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:34 pm
From the intro, as previously foreshadowed (pdf/html): This edition looks at two recent cases addressing indigent defense, one capital, State v. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 6:58 am
In the latest ruling, Davis v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 10:08 am
The Court’s 5-4 ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 8:35 am
See also Friedman v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 11:34 am
As importantly, in Gonzales v. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 6:07 am
The current version bars some or all people from seven, mostly Muslim-majority countries, from entering the United States. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:27 am
Stephen J. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 4:19 pm
In the case at bar, the testimony of the prosecution's expert began innocuously, as it was intended to help the jury understand the complainant's intellectual limitations in the aftermath of the crime similar to People v Carroll and People v Story. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 9:23 am
The holding in Gideon v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 4:44 pm
Stephens: If the district court holds that the habeas petitioner does indeed have a claim for ineffective assistance, does he need a certificate of appealability when the state appeals that holding, and the petitioner merely wants to argue on appeal other aspects of counsel's performance that the district court didn't find ineffective. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 1:40 pm
The Department of Justice filed the second case, United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:13 am
John Francis Stephens. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 7:15 am
In Part III, I defend Justice Antonin Scalia’s conclusion that “the Takings Clause bars the State from taking private property without paying for it, no matter which branch [of government] is the instrument of the taking. [read post]
