Search for: "Still v. Still" Results 601 - 620 of 72,388
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2010, 2:48 am by sally
Hammonds LLP (a Firm) v Jones Court of Appeal “‘All partners’ in the context of a clause in a partnership deed dealing with accounts, meant partners at any time during the accounting year to which the particular accounts related, whether or not, by the relevant time, they were still partners in the firm. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 9:56 pm by Patent Docs
First, any amended claim is still likely going to be subject to intervening... [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 6:00 am by Peter Vodola
But a question before the Court - whether South Carolina still recognized the tort of barratry - was left unanswered. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 7:49 am by Dr Mark Summerfield
Kimberly-Clark Australia Pty Ltd v Multigate Medical Products Pty Ltd [2011] FCAFC 86 (12 July 2011) Appeal from: Kimberly-Clark Australia Pty Ltd v Multigate Medical Products Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 1318 See also: That’s a Wrap! [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 6:54 pm by Christopher S. Jones
Of course, after the 7th Circuit decided Higginbotham v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 3:25 pm by The Complex Litigator
” More recently, in an easily overlooked opinion in the matter of Brinker Restaurant Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 6:11 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In his decision last week in the products liability case of Sikkelee v. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 3:59 pm
The latest installments are two opinions out of the NY Appellate Court, 2nd department, Casavecchia v. [read post]