Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 601 - 620
of 16,356
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
Last week marked the 10th anniversary of the US Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision known as Kelo v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 3:39 am
As explained in Hesham Ali v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] 1 WLR 4799, Parliamentary and public concern about failures to deport large numbers of foreign citizens who had committed serious offences in the UK led to the adoption of the UK Borders Act 2007, which provided that for the purpose of the Secretary of State’s power to deport under the 1971 Act, the deportation of a foreign criminal is conducive to the public good. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 8:19 am
Additional Resources: Johnson v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 8:33 am
Frank, et al. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 3:06 pm
In Galaviz, v. [read post]
11 Aug 2007, 9:36 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
(Ilya Somin) Virginia was one of several states that enacted a strong eminent domain reform law after the Supreme Court ruled in Kelo v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 9:03 pm
Americans have been long resistant to strong executive authority. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 5:02 am
Well, maybe wonderful is too strong a word, but definitely good compared to her other swings and misses. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 11:00 am
The post Vanity Keywords: Lawyer v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 11:37 am
After months of procedural wrangling, the merits at last have been joined in Doe v. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 10:04 am
However, they rejected the defence of fair comment on the basis that it was not comment “on facts truly stated”. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 5:00 am
When we mentioned Adkins v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 12:25 pm
In M/S Bremen v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 11:02 am
– Nampa Inc. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:41 pm
"We have stated many times that 'federal habeas corpus relief does not lie for errors of state law.'" Swarthout, at 4 (quoting Estelle v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 8:00 am
In ECA v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 8:59 am
The Supreme Court issued its opinion today in MORRISON ET AL. v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 9:11 pm
Worse on law and policy, because it would indicate that standing for states under Massachusetts v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 2:06 am
The Supreme Court gave a strong policy reason for this stating that refugee status “is a matter of significance and engages this country’s international obligations. [read post]
