Search for: "TEMPLE v. STATE" Results 601 - 620 of 786
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2011, 2:51 pm by Thomas McDow
Lawyers have traditionally represented indigent criminal defendants pro bono but much of that duty has been absorbed by The State in the aftermath of Gideon v. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 8:05 pm by Eugene Lee
You may attend the same Temple or Church for all you know, both love Pugs or a particular breed of dog or even have mutual friends. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 9:07 am by Aidan O'Neill QC, Matrix.
The Ministerial exception in US case law On 28 March 2011 the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and Perich v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 4:59 am by Matthew Flinn
This question was addressed in Revill v Newberry [1996] QB 567. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) There’s been much talk about the trial court decision in Mansour v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 4:56 am by Kelly
Temple Law (my alma mater) even offers a course on Low Income Taxpayer Policy and Practice which “enables students to see first hand the effect tax policies have on low income taxpayers and then to process that experience through the lens of existing tax policy scholarship and commentary. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
On Tuesday a Florida state circuit court judge issued a written opinion in Mansour v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 10:07 am by Ashwin Sharma
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Deputy Commissioner David V. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 12:26 pm by Bexis
Temple University Hospital, 781 A.2d 101, 107 (Pa. 2001) (emphasis added). [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 2:27 pm by Mike
In the second step, usually after the close of discovery, the defendant may move for decertification.In the two cases today Gee  focuses on step one and Temple v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 9:25 am by Charon QC
Back at the end of 2009 we reported the Supreme Court case of Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs v Meier and another, which upheld the use of a quia timet injunction – a prospective possession order – against a group of new travellers, preventing them from occupying any land owned by the Forestry Commission in the area. [read post]