Search for: "TIME WARNER"
Results 601 - 620
of 4,496
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2019, 1:51 pm
The Trump administration's DOJ in November 2017 filed a lawsuit to block AT&T's proposed acquisition of Time Warner. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 3:15 am
Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2019-02-23 https://t.co/BfATo51oKM 2019-02-24 Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2019-02-23 https://t.co/S5giLxi2L8 2019-02-24 A blueprint for regulating Google and Facebook | Buenos Aires Times https://t.co/EqbSSyAR3o 2019-02-24 Hacking the foreign-policy playbook: Tech-diplomat aims to protect democracy in digital age https://t.co/H09zEbAxLa 2019-02-24 Court rejects legal mulligans in enforcement of foreign judgements Barer v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 1:00 pm
In 2016, AT&T, a distributor of video content (among other things), announces $85 billion deal to buy Time Warner, a creator of video content. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 5:47 am
Since any judgment of the Court of Appeal would necessarily be given some time after that, it could well be the case that, whereas this Court currently has jurisdiction to make a reference, the Court of Appeal would not have jurisdiction to do so. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 5:36 am
Circuit unanimously ruled that not only may AT&T acquire Time Warner but that such a combination would be unlikely to harm competition. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 9:30 pm
Circuit affirmed a trial court ruling that rejected the federal government’s bid to block the AT&T–Time Warner merger. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 6:30 pm
Justice Department will not appeal AT&T, Time Warner merger after court loss. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 5:38 am
The post Federal appeals court rejects challenge to AT&T-Time Warner merger appeared first on JURIST - News - Legal News & Commentary. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 1:19 pm
The appellate court also emphasized the offer by Time Warner to accept a seven year period of binding arbitration and to maintain current compensation arrangements instead of withholding content. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 1:19 pm
The appellate court also emphasized the offer by Time Warner to accept a seven year period of binding arbitration and to maintain current compensation arrangements instead of withholding content. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 9:43 am
Media conglomerates like Time Warner engage in periodic negotiations with distributors like Comcast and AT&T. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:59 am
In Warner v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 6:06 pm
It is worth noting that the current administration is concerned that AT&T intends to use tactics like this to privilege Time Warner content over that of competitors. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 8:36 am
WARNER ROBINS NEWS Gunfire erupted Thursday evening, February 14, 2019 outside a Warner Robins convenience store leaving two victims shot and injured, according to media reports. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 1:00 am
A report from NBC News on Senator Burr’s comments concerning the possibility of collusion between Trump campaign and Russia, plus Senator Warner’s dispute. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 10:31 am
Air Force counterintelligence officer who defected to Iran and shared intelligence material with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, the New York Times reports. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 11:14 pm
Disorder in harmony The UK Supreme Court noted that the UK would be the only EPC jurisdiction (up to that time) to find the relevant claims to be insufficient. [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 2:13 am
Wilkof reports on the fascinating inquiry into the author of orphan works in a pre-copyright law times. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 6:12 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 3:38 pm
EFF raised these concerns specifically regarding the AT&T merger with Time Warner–HBO, where we predicted the ISP network would self-deal with its newly acquired content to the disadvantage of alternative video providers—which is exactly what it did. [read post]
