Search for: "Texas v. Oklahoma"
Results 601 - 620
of 993
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2007, 9:05 am
Opinion below (Court of Appeals of Maryland) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition (forthcoming) Amicus brief of Oklahoma, et al. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 10:49 am
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 12:33 pm
Texas (Ysleta I) correctly subjects the Pueblo to all Texas gaming regulations. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 11:01 pm
At Balkinization, guest blogger Sharon Dolovich explains why the Supreme Court’s Farmer v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am
[Jack Goldsmith and I will have this article out in the Texas Law Review early next year, and I'm serializing it here. [read post]
16 Dec 2006, 5:46 am
ESTNorthern Illinois Huskies v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
" Toner v. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 7:54 am
In ,Robison v. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 7:54 am
In ,Robison v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:55 am
District Court for the Northern District of Texas in Mary Kay, Inc. v. [read post]
CMS Vaccine Mandate Takes Effect in 26 States as Fifth Circuit Alters Scope of Nationwide Injunction
16 Dec 2021, 2:28 pm
District Court for the Northern District of Texas. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 2:21 pm
University of Texas serving as a recent example. [read post]
16 Dec 2006, 4:43 pm
ESTClemson Tigers v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 10:02 am
Nebraska and Oklahoma v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:58 am
Easton Enterprises (Patently-O) (IPBiz) (Reexamination Alert) District Court E D Texas: Jury verdict against Johnson & Johnson & Cordis of $482 million in case brought by Saffran (EDTexweblog.com) District Court N D Oklahoma: Tribal sovereign immunity shields Indian nation from liability for patent infringement: Specialty House of Creation, Incorporated v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 6:58 am
Goodrich v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 4:04 am
State from the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 11:15 am
Roman Catholic Archbishop v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm
Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice 12-1094Issue: Whether the Oklahoma Supreme Court erred in holding – without analysis or discussion – that the Oklahoma law requiring that abortion-inducing drugs be administered according to the protocol described on the drugs’ FDA-approved labels is facially unconstitutional under Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 8:13 am
In Himsel v. [read post]
