Search for: "The Active v. United States"
Results 601 - 620
of 18,200
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2022, 4:18 pm
(quoting State v. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 2:39 pm
Still, much of the sales activities occurred within the United States. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 7:10 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 6:26 am
See United States v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 10:10 am
In doing so, the Second Circuit addressed the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in Morrison v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 12:31 pm
” Roland argued that repairs and testing activities during the period of non-production met the definition of Unit Operations under the Lease. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 12:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 8:39 am
The need for a united policy during the War of Independence led the thirteen states to draft and approve an organic document for a national government. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 3:51 am
Brown, No. 1076, 564 U.S. ____ (2011) the United States Supreme Court was confronted with the following question: "Are foreign subsidiaries of a United States parent corporation amenable to suit in state court on claims unrelated to any activity of the subsidiaries in the forum State? [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 1:29 am
We posted last week on Carson and Others v The United Kingdom (read judgment), in which the European Court of Human Rights rejected a claim that UK pensioners living abroad should have their pensions index-linked (i.e., that they be raised in line with inflation). [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 2:29 pm
In United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:01 am
At the same time that the Citizens United v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 5:49 am
United States Supreme Court decisions that deal with constitutional issues apply to every state. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 9:36 pm
§ 1498(a) The statute states:Whenever an invention described in and covered by a patent of the United States is used or manufactured by or for the United States . . . the owner’s remedy shall be by action against the United States in the United States Court of Federal Claims . . . .28 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 8:35 pm
The United States (DOJ and PTO) argued that cert should be granted on this issue, agreeing with Commil that issues of validity are irrelevant to infringement. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 12:06 pm
The United States Supreme Court recognized this right in Bad Elk v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 4:10 pm
” The Second Circuit handed down its reversal today in United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:22 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently dismissed the appeal in Comer v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 9:52 am
It is a Federal crime to export any firearms outside the United States without of license. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 9:52 am
It is a Federal crime to export any firearms outside the United States without of license. [read post]
