Search for: "The Confederate Note Case"
Results 601 - 620
of 794
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2012, 9:34 am
It seems some good old fashioned democratic engagement and industry concern, including a letter from the Confederation of British Industry (here), was responsible. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 4:52 am
Indeed, a civil law codification usually “contains many legal terms which either do not exist in common law jurisdictions or have different connotations in the case of literal translations”. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 9:00 pm
Whether immediately or after some period of time, opinion leaders, politicians, and the public often fall in line.This was the case in various European nations after they abolished capital punishment decisions. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 11:33 pm
Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc., noting “government statements (and government actions and programs that take the form of speech) do not normally trigger the First Amendment rules designed to protect the marketplace of ideas”? [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
But since the free speech provisions came later, in case of conflict, they prevail. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 5:51 am
It is interesting to note that Congressmen from Union states were still required to use the 1862 version of the oath. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 3:52 am
Did the students really spend their free time reading 1925 Wisconsin State Journal articles just in case a racist word was uttered? [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 8:39 am
As some of the petitioners in these cases demonstrate, marriage embodies a love that may endure even past death. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 5:07 am
Term Limits, which was the petitioner in the 1995 Supreme Court case. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 6:16 am
But note how the Court described the program: This case concerns a flagpole outside Boston City Hall. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 10:01 pm
As the Texas Court of Appeals noted in 1997 (see below), Hardin frequently stated that “he had never killed anyone who didn’t deserve to be killed. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case that would decide whether the 14th Amendment disqualifies former President Trump from running for president again. [read post]
2 Sep 2007, 11:25 am
., the Articles of Confederation--and ask if in fact the U.S. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 9:05 pm
President Trump opposed the act in part because it required the Pentagon to rename military bases and installations named after Confederate leaders. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 9:01 pm
Though I might note that some twitter uses (or at least one twitter user) are (is) coming to the defense of JoePa. [read post]
1 Nov 2006, 5:00 pm
POST SCRIPT 1: On a related note, Mike Stark has filed a criminal complaint over this incident. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 7:13 am
If it is viewed as a conflicts rule, its content would fall to be determined on a case-by-case basis by the courts in decisions in which they would attempt to implement the objectives of order and fairness in the legal system. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 7:13 am
If it is viewed as a conflicts rule, its content would fall to be determined on a case-by-case basis by the courts in decisions in which they would attempt to implement the objectives of order and fairness in the legal system. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 7:55 am
” The plaintiffs won this case on climate science. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 8:58 am
To be sure, this framework created by Sosa has been, as I noted above, under-appreciated – by which I mean more or less ignored. [read post]
