Search for: "The Judges of the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals" Results 601 - 620 of 851
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2011, 9:22 am by CJLF Staff
Judge Frank Hull, writing for the majority, said when the U.S. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 5:07 am
An appeals court dismissed the defendant's appeal, but the Alabama Supreme Court ruled that the judge's decision to try to amend the "not guilty" verdict wasn't proper. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:31 am by Russ Bensing
Alabama and Jackson v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 9:56 am
On appeal, the Alabama Supreme Court ruled that this amounted to double jeopardy and couldn't be done. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:49 pm by KC Johnson
” A procedural reminder: this appeal, which Judge Beaty granted despite the only on-point precedent coming from the Middle District of Alabama, involves the City’s attempt to have the case dismissed before any discovery occurs. ---------------- One reason, perhaps, for Durham’s aggressive attempt to overturn Judge Beaty’s decision came last week, when the Supreme Court considered a grand jury immunity case, Rehberg v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 7:00 am by Rachel Myers, ACLU
The prosecution's case against Spradley was alarmingly thin and riddled with inconsistencies, and in ordering a new trial the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals found that much of it was "improperly admitted. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:05 pm by Lyle Denniston
Alabama has also filed a cross-appeal in the Eleventh Circuit seeking to enforce all of its law. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm by John Elwood
Texas, 10-10838, a capital case in which the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals issued a forty-page unpublished opinion affirming the trial court’s judgment on direct appeal. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:27 am by Lyle Denniston
Alabama (11-9646) and Jackson v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 12:03 pm by Steve Gosset, ACLU
Two of the more-pernicious sections of HB56, Alabama's sweeping anti-immigrant law, were blocked this afternoon by a federal appeals court. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am by John Elwood
District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands has jurisdiction to hear criminal cases arising under the laws of the United States, because its judges do not enjoy the protections of Article III of the Constitution. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm by Kiera Flynn
District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands has jurisdiction to hear criminal cases arising under the laws of the United States, because its judges do not enjoy the protections of Article III of the Constitution. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 5:29 am by Aaron Tang
Joseph Hoffmann – Regardless of how the Supreme Court decides the case, the Maples saga illustrates two key problems with our criminal justice system. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:53 pm by John Elwood
Alabama, 10-9646, and Jackson v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 6:55 am by Conor McEvily
Dalesio of the Associated Press (via Forbes) covers a recent cert. denial in a case seeking to appeal criminal charges accusing a North Carolina company of violating federal clean water law. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 2:53 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
De Leeuw and Butler scrambled to ask the trial court to reissue its denial order so they could file an out-of-time appeal, but their motion was denied as was a request to the state criminal appeals court. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 6:29 pm by Steve Hall
Deadlines usually matter a lot at the Supreme Court, where a few years back a defendant who was late to file an appeal because the judge gave his lawyer the wrong date still lost his case. [read post]
On September 30, 2011, a unanimous Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals ordered a new trial for ACLU client Montez Spradley. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 5:43 pm by Charley Moore and Eva Arevuo
A similar law in Alabama is following suit through the lower courts, drawing out the state-federal dispute over immigration. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 9:34 pm by David Oscar Markus
Some appeals court judges have said that such surveillance put them in mind of George Orwell’s novel “1984. [read post]