Search for: "The People v. Chambers"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,867
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2020, 5:45 am
In 1868, the Court of Common Pleas heard the case of Chorlton v Lings where, as was feared by some MPs, it was argued that the Interpretation Act 1850 provided the term “man” in the Representation of the People Act 1867 “shall be deemed and taken to include females … unless the contrary is expressly provided” and meant that women who otherwise met the eligibility requirements could vote. [read post]
28 May 2010, 11:18 am
Fine is presiding over State of Texas v. [read post]
5 May 2021, 1:18 pm
Gutman) and Roma people (Ms. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 10:27 am
Haas v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 1:24 pm
The Ninth Chamber of the General Court gave judgment today in a fierce battle over a Community trade mark application in Case T‑170/12, Beyond Retro Ltd v OHIM, the other party to the proceedings being a US company, S&K Garments, Inc., which was victorious in the Board of Appeal. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 10:45 pm
| Generic marks as valuable commercial information | Other people's computers | Compared to Svensson, GS Media is not that bad after all | Introducing our new InternKats! [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 10:00 am
And when the court addressed the 1846 retrocession in Phillips v. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 2:43 pm
” Thiel v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 10:40 am
The prize -- to remind readers -- is complimentary registration, complete with a free lunch, at CLT's conference this Wednesday, 29 October, "Intellectual Property: the 'no patents' round-up for non-techie people", organised by CLT and held in Central London [it's still not too late to sign up for this joyous event, even if you're not the winner of this competition ...].The pain. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 2:23 pm
In addition, Breyer cited a 2005 in-chambers opinion by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, in Doe v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 3:11 pm
See Cuba v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 3:37 am
It’s somewhat of an odd result, given that people have gone to the gas chamber on less circumstantial evidence than there was in this case. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:51 am
On 7 December 2011, the judge gave his full reasons for making this unusual order (Law Society (and others) v Rick Kordowski [2011] EWHC 3185 (QB)). [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 2:39 pm
That will certainly be the case tomorrow, when the Court hears oral arguments in Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:17 pm
Chambers challenged any easy assumption that “polygamy deserves to be looked on less favorably than same-sex marriage. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:43 pm
Shaheen Rahman is a barrister at 1 Crown Office Row chambers. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:46 am
After the 8th District’s decision last week in Wallace v. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 5:59 am
I thought that Roe v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 5:01 am
And, sometimes, a taxpayer might report nothing, or even fail to file a return, as a reaction to an information return that reports more than what the taxpayer thinks should be reported.A recent case, Chambers v. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 12:58 pm
Alongside this impressive advocacy, the Law Center was litigating a class action to aid those imprisoned at Tamms (Westefer v. [read post]
