Search for: "The United States District Court for the Central District of California" Results 601 - 620 of 2,181
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
” Now, on December 30, 2019 – just two days before AB 5 goes into effect – two of those companies (and two drivers) have filed suit in Los Angeles in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, seeking to enjoin AB 5 as it pertains to them. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 4:55 pm by Kenneth Yood and Brittany Walter*
District Court for the Central District of California to overrule the Gardens Decision and the Bankruptcy Court’s conclusion that the closed Hospital did not qualify as a health facility. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 4:55 pm by Kenneth Yood and Brittany Walter*
District Court for the Central District of California to overrule the Gardens Decision and the Bankruptcy Court’s conclusion that the closed Hospital did not qualify as a health facility. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 4:55 pm by Kenneth Yood and Brittany Walter*
District Court for the Central District of California to overrule the Gardens Decision and the Bankruptcy Court’s conclusion that the closed Hospital did not qualify as a health facility. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 10:08 am by Adam Gillette
Wright II, a United States District Court Judge for the Central District of California, has filed for bankruptcy. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 6:59 pm
Pa- tent No. 7,892,281 (“’281 patent”), appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Central District of California granting summary judgment to Edwards Lifesciences Corp., Edwards Lifesciences LLC, and Edwards Lifesciences (U.S.) [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 12:30 pm
Plaintiff, held as a federal prisoner in a state prison, was subject to a separation order from the United States Marshal's Service requiring him to be separated from three other federal inmates being held at the same facility. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 7:58 am by Beth Graham
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States issued a decision holding class arbitration is not permitted in situations where an agreement to arbitrate is silent on the issue. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 1:53 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In a 46-page opinion filed February 14 and ordered published on March 15, 2017, the Fourth District Court of Appeal rejected numerous CEQA challenges to Riverside County’s approval of an EIR for Specific Plan 380, a 200-acre master-planned, mixed-use community in the County’s French Valley region. [read post]
4 May 2018, 7:21 am by Beth Graham
  The Central District of California granted the company’s motion, but stated class arbitration was permitted due to ambiguity in the parties’ agreement to arbitrate. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 6:11 am by Antitrust Today
District Court for the Central District of California against TCS Education System, David Figuli, and Global Equities, LTD, alleging that the defendants’ have harmed competition and will increase the cost of tuition for evening law schools in the California tri-county region of San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara and Ventura Counties. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 12:00 am by Kevin Watson
Cal Aug. 15, 2017), the United States District Court for the Central District of California denied Wedbush Securities, Inc., Edward Wedbush, Gary Wedbush, Wedbush Securities In. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 3:56 pm
Before this, she served as an Associate Justice on the Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division Three in San Francisco.Prior to her judicial appointments, she served as Senior Staff Attorney to Supreme Court of California Associate Justice Edward Panelli, whom she would later replace on the high court, and as a Senior Staff Attorney of the Central Staff at the First Appellate District, Court of Appeal.A native San… [read post]
9 May 2013, 11:43 am by Sheppard Mullin
The United States District Courts for the Northern and Central Districts of California granted defendants’ motions and dismissed the complaints. [read post]