Search for: "Thomas v. Jones" Results 601 - 620 of 953
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2012, 2:33 pm by Liz Campbell
The recent decision of the US Supreme Court in United States v Jones has brought one particular form of surveillance of suspected individuals to the fore in public debate, namely the use of global positioning surveillance (GPS). [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 4:43 am by Broc Romanek
Bob Monks recently blogged about his experience of attending the SCOTUS' Jones v. [read post]
30 May 2016, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
Last Monday, the Supreme Court decided Foster v. [read post]
1 Sep 2007, 8:09 am
Jones, 395 F.3d 577, 602 (6th Cir. 2005) (applying the Schlup standard to determine whether a late-filed claim should be equitably tolled under AEDPA), we reverse. 07a0346p.06 2007/08/28 USA  v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 2:04 am
In  concluding that Kogan had not sufficiently contributed to the screenplay [para 85], even by adding to the first three drafts, Hacon J considered the following points and authorities:  Adding elements not themselves covered by copyright, such as scenic effects, is not a sufficient contribution (as per Tate v Thomas [1921] 1 Ch 503)Providing helpful criticism and expert feedback on the work is not a sufficient contribution (as per Wiseman v George Weidenfeld… [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
Justice Thomas argued that the entire “reasonable expectation of privacy” framework from Katz v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am by INFORRM
On Wednesday 10 April 2024 there were hearings in the cases of Jones Nickolds ltd v Ian Robert Pearce KB-2024-000886 and Specialty Coffee Association Ltd v Elizabeth Odushola KB-2023-002556. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"[A] government entity that does not supply any record in response to a FOIL request 'shall certify that it does not have possession of such record or that such record cannot be found after diligent search' " (Matter of Thomas v Kane, 203 AD3d 1487, 1489 [3d Dept 2022], quoting Public Officers Law § 89 [3] [a]). [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"[A] government entity that does not supply any record in response to a FOIL request 'shall certify that it does not have possession of such record or that such record cannot be found after diligent search' " (Matter of Thomas v Kane, 203 AD3d 1487, 1489 [3d Dept 2022], quoting Public Officers Law § 89 [3] [a]). [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Thomas, No. 07-1237 Denial of a motion to suppress evidence in a drug and weapons prosecution is affirmed where the defendant was searched pursuant to a lawful arrest for resisting arrest. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 11:41 am
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard argument in Ledbetter v. [read post]