Search for: "Tims v. Tims" Results 601 - 620 of 2,073
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2013, 2:01 pm by Joe Patrice
The Roberts Court: Corruption, Campaign Finance, and McCutcheon v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 8:22 am
Awaiting Warner-Lambert v ActavisOver at the IP Alchemist blog, former Kat Darren Smyth takes a look at the recent decision from the CJEU in the case of Teva v Gilead C-121/17: Teva v Gilead – C-121/17 provides some clarity on combination products. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 11:21 pm by Evan Anderson
Intellectual Property Law is a complicated area of law, yet high profile copyright, patent, and trademark cases have caught the public's imagination and intellectual property law is now a niche topic in mainstream news reporting.The recent Samsung v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 2:13 am by Walter Olson
Justice Scalia on the rule of lenity in U.S. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 9:32 pm
Here is the Verified Motion to Acknowledge Jursidiction and Establish Expedited Briefing Schedule in the case of Curley v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 3:05 am by Walter Olson
Florida law firm that served drinks isn’t responsible for death of employee who walked home intoxicated and was hit by train [Florida appeals court, Salerno v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 5:34 am by Daniel E. Cummins
., trial court judge in the Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas, entered a directed verdict in favor of the hospital defendants in the case of Williamson v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 7:52 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: At his eponymous blog, Lyle Denniston reports that yesterday the Justices denied rehearing in a capital case out of Louisiana “that they had passed up last Term, thus rejecting a new attempt by lawyers to turn it into a sequel to the Justices’ important Sixth Amendment ruling in January in Hurst v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm by Walter Olson
High times at the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service [Luke Rosiak, Examiner via Jim Harper, Cato] 6th Circuit: In ruling company’s suit against union to be unfair labor practice, NLRB breezed past First Amendment issues [NLRB v. [read post]