Search for: "Tom Goldstein"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,135
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2014, 10:54 am
Tom Goldstein at SCOTUSblog, Don Cruse at the Supreme Court of Texas Blog, Howard Bashman at How Appealing, Glenn Reynolds at Instapundit, and Steven F. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 10:28 am
Scotus blog’s Tom Goldstein writes that the Court divided equally on whether maritime law permits punitives for the acts of agents. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 5:36 am
And at "SCOTUSblog," Tom Goldstein has a lengthy post titled "The Potential Nomination of Merrick Garland: Analysis of his record. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 12:01 am
Tom Goldstein has thoughtful comments in this video. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 2:18 pm
There are some notable differences.Market definitionEpic's counsel, Tom Goldstein, stated his client's preference for the appeals court to resolve the matter on the basis of the rule of reason, without a remand. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 11:13 am
Jaffe, Tom Goldstein, Robert Barnes, and William Van Alstyne. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 5:35 am
Tom Goldstein has posted details on the opinion here. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 1:06 pm
(Tom Goldstein of SCOTUSblog has his own post about this.) [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 8:14 am
Tom Goldstein has this post at SCOTUSblog reviewing his record. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 11:44 pm
Goldstein, a.k.a. [read post]
1 May 2015, 10:00 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 9:19 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 11:57 am
This edition of “Petitions to watch” features petitions raising issues that Tom has determined to have a reasonable chance of being granted, although we post them here without consideration of whether they present appropriate vehicles in which to decide those issues. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 8:44 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 4:00 pm
Pincus, Mayer Brown LLP, co-director of the Yale Law School Supreme Court Clinic Tom Goldstein, Akin Gump and SCOTUSblog __________________ Host: Federalist Society Date: July 1, 12:00 to 2:30 p.m. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 9:51 am
Tom Henson, Oral History Interview: Tom Henson (2019). [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 8:19 am
As always, the list reflects the petitions on the Court’s paid docket that Tom has deemed to have a reasonable chance of being granted. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 1:59 pm
The Court chose not to hear the appeal, but Alito penned an interesting opinion strongly condemning Baer’s practice, what Scotusblog’s Tom Goldstein described as “a warning shot that some anomalous practices should be stopped without the Court ever having to get involved. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 10:33 am
As Tom Goldstein observed while live-blogging about the decision, the power to adjourn has never been tested. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 11:15 am
Check out this summary from noted Supreme Court practitioner and watcher Tom Goldstein. [read post]
