Search for: "True Trade Holdings, Inc." Results 601 - 620 of 969
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2013, 8:37 am by admin
 Do you think that Starbucks Inc. will cave to that pressure? [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 8:37 am by Doorey
 Do you think that Starbucks Inc. will cave to that pressure? [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 12:30 pm by WIMS
 Now, it's true that no single event makes a trend. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:35 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc., --- F.3d ----, 2013 WL 276080 (Fed. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 9:40 am by Sheppard Mullin
In so holding, the court recognized that, “[w]hile it may be true that auction houses commonly withhold the names of consignors…, this Court is governed not by the practice in the trade, but by the relevant statute. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 6:40 am by Sheppard Mullin
In so holding, the court recognized that, “[w]hile it may be true that auction houses commonly withhold the names of consignors…, this Court is governed not by the practice in the trade, but by the relevant statute. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 6:00 pm by Jonathan Macey
” The district court found that this statement was literally true because market timers were identified and restricted from making further trades. [read post]
25 Dec 2012, 8:08 am by Shouvik Kumar Guha
National Football Scouting Inc., the scouting arm of the National Football League lost a copyright case in the US District Court of Tacoma against a Washington State resident, who wrote about its annual scouting reports for a sports-oriented website.Image from here Microsoft has won a U.K. ruling invalidating Motorola Mobility Holdings Inc. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 5:32 am by Rebecca Tushnet
“This trade dress infringement action concerns the appearance of bins used to hold pistachios in grocery stores. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 2:38 am by Russell Beck
For a discussion of the case, see “California Appellate Court Holds That Non-Compete Restriction in Stipulated Injunction Is Enforceable Because There Was No Showing That It Was Not Necessary to Protect Trade Secrets. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 11:05 pm by Florian Mueller
At the beginning of its motion, Apple notes that "[v]arious parties are exclusively interested in the district court's ruling that Motorola Inc. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 10:39 am by Rebecca Tushnet
KTurbo, Inc., --- F.3d ----, 2012 WL 4856489 (7th Cir.) [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Where goods were first manufactured overseas, however, courts have been virtually unanimous in holding that the first sale doctrine does not apply — I’ve only been able to find one case in the past 30 years that has held otherwise. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Where goods were first manufactured overseas, however, courts have been virtually unanimous in holding that the first sale doctrine does not apply — I’ve only been able to find one case in the past 30 years that has held otherwise. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 7:49 pm by Francis Pileggi
Even for those documents that may be true trade secrets, the routine procedure in Chancery is for both a protective order to be entered and a restriction for “attorneys’ eyes only”. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
After trial, the Court addressing both claims held that (i) citing In re Tele-Communications, Inc. and Levco v. [read post]