Search for: "U. S. v. Light" Results 601 - 620 of 1,817
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
Atlanta, GA Julio Lopez-De Dips, A206 011 402 (BIA Mar. 1, 2016) (2016 WL 1084489) - The BIA remanded the matter to the IJ for reconsideration of the respondent’s motion to continue in light of the respondent’s marriage to a U.S. citizen and the U.S. citizen spouse’s plans to file an I-130 for respondent. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
Atlanta, GA Julio Lopez-De Dips, A206 011 402 (BIA Mar. 1, 2016) (2016 WL 1084489) - The BIA remanded the matter to the IJ for reconsideration of the respondent’s motion to continue in light of the respondent’s marriage to a U.S. citizen and the U.S. citizen spouse’s plans to file an I-130 for respondent. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 2:36 pm by John Floyd
The legal question before the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (“CCA”) in a November 2, 2022 decision, State v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 3:48 am by Dennis Crouch
Pedraza-Fariña & Ryan Whalen, A Network Theory of Patentability, 87 U. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 6:33 pm by Adam Zimmerman
  These arguments may have even more force in light of the Supreme Court's decisions in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 2:01 pm by Eric Goldman
And even where the plaintiff, platform, time, content, and defendant line up, the links must be evaluated in light of the platform’s independent incentives to moderate content Based on the weak complaint, the plaintiffs’ case falls apart. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:47 pm
This is a follow-up to this morning’s post on the Supreme Court’s decision in Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 8:18 am by Benjamin Iscoe
In the Ontario Divisional Court decision of Simpson v Global Warranty[1], the issue was the application of a specific termination clause in an employment contract where the employer violated the contract in the course of the termination. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 3:00 am by Louis M. Solomon
  The noteworthy portions of the decision for purposes of international practice include the following: The Court considered “preliminarily whether the Ordinary Share Purchasers can bring Exchange Act claims at all in light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in” Morrison v. [read post]