Search for: "U. S. v. Marks"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,467
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2024, 2:01 pm
Indeed, the majority opinion doesn’t contain a single mention of last month’s NRA v. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 9:30 pm
Here's the abstract: City of Cleburne v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 2:24 pm
S. 125, 139 (1998) (internal quotation marks omitted), such that the Court must simply "'guess as to what Congress intended.'" Bifulco [v. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
That profound change starting in the 14th century marks the character and premises of modern “law” in the United States. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 3:40 am
Corp. v Farrell Fritz, P.C., 17 Misc 3d 132[A], 2007 NY Slip Op 51999[U] [App Term, 2d & 11th Jud Dists 2007]). [read post]
14 May 2014, 5:02 am
KI filed a counterclaim, alleging false patent marking and other claims. [read post]
27 May 2011, 7:15 am
The state's legal community and insurance industry will be watching closely on Tuesday, May 24, 2011, when the California Supreme Court reviews Rebecca Howell v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 3:07 am
Rani Sachdev, Opposition No. 91215100 (January 20, 2016) [precedential].Opposer Emilio Pucci opposed Sachdev's application to register the mark St. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 9:07 am
Mark Stuart U. and Michael Pratt, an engineer/accident reconstructionist. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 7:30 am
S. 127 (1994) , and Foster v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 2:00 pm
S. 3, 20 (1997); internal quotation marks omitted); see Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:10 am
State v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:16 pm
” 17 U. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 4:30 am
http://t.co/MTaVwK821N -> Peter S. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 1:46 pm
S. 302, 326 (2002) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 11:22 pm
SBCs Required By 1st Day Of 1st Enrollment Period Beginning After September 22, 2012 Health Plan-U Coping With Health Care Reform Workshop Series Provide Timely Updates Beginning July 24 The June 28, 2012 Supreme Court National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 5:00 am
Last week brought another example of the chaos being caused in preemption jurisprudence by the Supreme Court’s sloppily reasoned decision in Wyeth v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 2:08 pm
S. 167, 174 (2001) (quoting United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 10:06 am
S. 861 (2000); Hillsborough County v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 9:45 am
So what can we take away from Iancu v. [read post]