Search for: "U. S. v. Price"
Results 601 - 620
of 797
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2010, 12:39 pm
Market prices won't do as a proxy for utility, for a variety of reasons including wealth effects. [read post]
21 May 2015, 9:00 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Committee for a Better Arvin v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 5:39 am
A firm might want to deliver high-end advertisements to wealthy neighborhoods, or to deliver coupons when customers enter the mall, or offer a Burger King discount at a McDonald's, or promote farm-related software in rural areas.[5] In addition, online firms seek to segment markets geographically so that they can price discriminate based on differences in wealth or product demand by geography. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 8:03 am
Chicago Housing Authority v. 3721-3723 Elston Condominium and Tera Healy, 2014 IL App (1st) 130626-U (May 23, 2014). [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
Of Printer Cartridges and Patent Exhaustion: The En Banc Federal Circuit is Poised to Clarify Quanta
21 Apr 2015, 7:19 pm
A regular price cartridge without these terms is available. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 8:45 am
Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 (1977), and Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:44 am
U. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
Chapter Readings· U. [read post]
3 Sep 2022, 7:05 am
U.S. f/u/b/o McKenney’s, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:00 pm
A recent trial court ruling in a case called Arfa v. [read post]
21 May 2017, 4:41 pm
The Panopticon Blog has an interesting post on “medical privacy” dealing with the case of ABC v St George’s Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (2017) EWCA Civ 336 which concludes that clinicians treating a patient with Huntingdon’s disease have an arguable duty to disclose the diagnosis to the patient’s daughters. [read post]
19 May 2016, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court declined to rule on the merits in Zubik v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 3:29 am
Not according to a recent decision by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Saliann Scarpulla in Balkind v Nickel, 2018 NY Slip Op 31703(U) [Sup Ct NY County July 16, 2018], in which she dismissed a deadlock dissolution petition filed under Section 1104 of the Business Corporation Law brought by a 49% shareholder, despite his co-equal board and shareholder control. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 4:30 am
Ferenets v Kenworthy 2019 NY Slip Op 33751(U) November 22, 2019 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 712299/2019 Judge: Cheree A. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:59 am
The case and Justice Knipel’s decision in Celauro v 4C Foods Corp., 2016 NY Slip Op 31917(U) [Sup Ct Kings County Oct. 12, 2016], is the latest in a series of litigations and court rulings between two factions of the Celauro family beginning around 2005, following the death of Nathan’s father the year before. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 9:07 pm
The Supreme Court’s 1997 decision in Auer v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
Like most Americans, I believe Roe v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 11:51 am
The story highlights the fact that advertising restraints (like other types of competition restraints, such as relating to price, output, etc.) can be insulated from competition challenges when they are lodged in valid provincial or federal legislation (based on Canada’s “regulated conduct doctrine”). [read post]
9 May 2009, 6:45 am
CASES* In Gorman v. [read post]