Search for: "U. S. v. Price"
Results 601 - 620
of 876
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2012, 8:10 am
She will get no free ride or food, at the expense of another consumer forced to pay an inflated price. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:00 am
Supreme Court’s dismissal in First American Financial Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
Justice Scheinkman's thorough, 26-page decision in White v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:31 am
S. 184, and Price v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 3:32 am
In Ehrenhalt v Kinder; 2011 NY Slip Op 30375(U); February 15, 2011; Supreme Court, New York County ;Judge: Martin Shulman we see how things went bad: "At the time she signed the contract, Shapolsky tendered the contract deposit of $85,000 directly to Kinder. [read post]
24 May 2012, 7:14 am
Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 12:25 pm
Sandager v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 4:37 am
Each of the men's shirts was originally priced at $75 but rang up at $28.99. [read post]
7 May 2012, 11:20 am
Texas, 509 U. [read post]
4 May 2012, 10:00 am
eMove Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 2:05 pm
Case Information Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 9:25 am
v=yMLZO-sObzQ There’s also a pretty good play, and more parties than you can shake a groove thing at! [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
U. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 10:42 am
S. 303, 309 (1980); Le Roy v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 8:24 am
Apple’s five co-defendants (publishers) were not happy with Amazon’s $9.99 pricing model, either. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 1:08 pm
The IPKat's rapid response to the Australian ruling in Roadshow v iiNet on ISP liability for authorising copyright infringement. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 2:20 am
Here, in Campbell v Planet Asef Realty 2012 NY Slip Op 50679(U) Decided on April 10, 2012 Appellate Term, Second Department we see a recurring legal malpractice situation in one sector of the housing market. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 4:04 pm
Moreover, greater certainty of price for a longer period always comes at a price. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 7:07 am
The court also rejected Cooke’s objection to the admittance of unrelated emails, including some to an alleged 16-year-old, saying Cooke’s response (“that’s cool that ur young, but i don’t want u to narc”) was further evidence of his propensity and not hearsay. [read post]