Search for: "U.S. v. Nixon*"
Results 601 - 620
of 801
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am
He certainly wasn’t stupid – having managed single-handedly to climb from exceedingly humble beginnings to the center chair of the U.S. [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:32 am
One theory is that the attorneys could site a 1997 opinion by the U.S. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 5:27 pm
In that case, the U.S. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 10:27 am
See Weinberg v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 10:57 am
The resolutions authorizing both the Nixon and Clinton impeachment proceedings granted the judiciary committee this authority. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 11:40 am
Over the new year, Congress overrode President Trump’s veto to enact into law the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for fiscal 2021—an annual piece of legislation that lays out the budget, expenditures and policies of the Pentagon for the upcoming year. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 2:18 pm
That lead to the establishment of the Senior Interdepartmental Group, “whose members were: the Under Secretary of State, Deputy Secretary of Defense, Administrator of the Agency for International Development, DCI, JCS Chairman, Director of the U.S. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 7:48 am
In Trump v. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 8:11 am
United States v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 7:57 am
The reason it is probable is U.S. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am
In a particularly egregious case, the administration rearranged the line of succession in the U.S. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 8:51 pm
Ringgold v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 7:08 am
A Hoover fellow since 1983, he is currently a member of the U.S. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 6:45 am
It was introduced in Nixon v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 6:51 am
Maybe we don't need courts anymore, depending on how the Supremes handle the arbitration issues raised in the important AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 12:35 pm
Of course, if the President does appoint a special prosecutor, that prosecutor would be far more likely to be able to compel testimony before a grand jury under the authority of U.S. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:00 am
” Magarian says that state initiatives only become a matter of federal law if their substantive content violates the U.S. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 4:33 pm
In Nixon-Tinkelman v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 4:34 am
” At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Shannon Rohn discusses the court’s recent decision in in Endrew F. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 12:44 pm
And in 1926, Supreme Court Chief Justice William Howard Taft said in Myers v. [read post]
