Search for: "UKSC Blog"
Results 601 - 615
of 615
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
Blogging and Tweeting without Getting Sued: A global guide to the law for anyone writing online by Dr Mark Pearson, based at Bond University, Australia. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 1:00 am
Conservative religious views, parental access, the ECHR – and blogging: A v Cornwall Council. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 12:20 am
A cause of action is “a factual situation the existence of which entitles one person to obtain from the court a remedy against another person” (Letang v Cooper [1965] 1 QB 232, 242-243 (Diplock LJ); Roberts v Gill [2011] 1 AC 240, [2010] UKSC 22 (19 May 2010) [41] (Lord Collins); Murphy v O’Toole [2014] IEHC 486 (17 October 2014) [57]-[58] (Baker J); see also PR v KC [2014] IEHC 126 (11 March 2014) [36] (Baker J), but note Clarke v O’Gorman [2014] IESC 72… [read post]
Freedom of Expression and Freedom of Information: Part 1 The European Convention – Hugh Tomlinson QC
4 May 2010, 5:38 pm
He is also a founding editor of the UKSC Blog. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
He is also a founding editor of the UKSC Blog. [read post]
Ireland: Better late than never – the Defamation (Amendment) Bill 2024 is finally here – Eoin O’Dell
21 Aug 2024, 4:53 pm
As Lord Sumption explained (Lords Kerr, Wilson, Hodge and Briggs concurring) in Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd [2020] AC 612, [2019] UKSC 27 (12 June 2019) [16], the main reason why harm which was less than “serious” had given rise to liability before the Act was that damage to reputation was presumed from the words alone and might therefore be very different from any damage which could be established in fact. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 1:00 am
And, in the application of Jameel, the UK Supreme Court in Flood v Times Newspapers Ltd [2012] 2 AC 273, [2012] UKSC 11 (21 March 2012) provided significant latitude to editorial judgment. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 5:25 pm
In this feature we revisit some older posts which are still of current interest. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm
As the Explanatory Notes to the 2013 Act make clear, this condition is intended to reflect the test approved by the Supreme Court in Joseph v Spiller [2010] UKSC 53 that “the comment must explicitly or implicitly indicate, at least in general terms, the facts on which it is based” and “is intended to retain the broad principles of the current common law defence as to the necessary basis for the opinion expressed…”. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 2:55 am
The case of Xanthopoulos v Rakshina [2022] EWFC 30 has hit the headlines because of the eye watering legal costs, and the excoriating judicial criticism of the parties for running them up. [read post]
18 Oct 2024, 1:49 am
This decision came online earlier this week, on 14 October 2024, and the outcome was a surprise to many. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 12:12 pm
Continuing our annual tradition, we have compiled our top developments and headlines for 2019 & 2020 in trade secret, non-compete, and computer fraud law. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am
1. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 4:07 pm
The ubiquity of social media platforms and their significance in disseminating information (true or false) to potentially wide groups of people was highly unlikely to have been in the minds of the European legislators when they agreed, in 2000, the e-Commerce Directive (Directive 2000/31/EC) (ECD). [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 1:06 am
Not long ago I wrote a tiresomely long post about what I will call the transparency in financial remedy (FR) cases, a topic about which there has been much recent debate (see Very Much Ancillary, published here and elsewhere). [read post]
