Search for: "US v. Diaz" Results 601 - 620 of 874
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2010, 5:55 am by Brian Shiffrin
Not only should the holding in Meekins be questioned, but also those of the courts in US v Feliz (467 F3d 227 [2d Cir. 2006]) and People v Freycinet (11 NY3d 38 [2008]) limiting the application of Crawford with respect to autopsy reports. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 10:15 am by Michael Lowe
  Let us only hope that the United States Supreme Court uses Briscoe to support Melendez-Diaz, and not to erase the victory for justice that Melendez-Diaz represents. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 9:00 pm by Gideon
This week brings us two distinct takes on the problem of homelessness. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 11:00 am by Michael Lowe
  As we’ve discussed, whether or not police lab experts can be cross-examined by criminal defense counsel was decided this summer in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 11:56 am by Steve Hall
In it's last term, the Supreme Court issued Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 6:33 am by Erin Miller
Virginia, another case to be argued Monday, the Court will revisit the issue decided in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 12:16 pm by Erin Miller
Well, only four days after the Court decided Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 4:50 am by Mack Sperling
Andy pointed out that the mediation rules used to provide for even harsher sanctions for a non-attending party, including dismissal of the case, and told me that the Court of Appeals affirmed such a sanction years ago, in Triad Mack Sales and Service, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 5:26 am by Ray Mullman
  That’s also how that canceled check ended as a primary exhibit in the case of State of Texas v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 7:36 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Over the weekend the New York Times ran a story by Adam Liptak previewing a US Supreme Court case ("Justices revisit rule requiring lab testimony," Dec. 19) called Briscoe v. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 4:17 am
Virginia, revisiting the Supreme Court's decision last term in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]