Search for: "US v. Harris"
Results 601 - 620
of 4,871
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2014, 3:50 am
A friendly reminder: We rely on our readers to send us links for the round-up. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 8:47 am
The first one, Harris v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 8:50 am
In Harris v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 7:06 am
In United States v Quality Stores Inc. [read post]
Fed. Dist. Court of PA Grants Church’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction on RLUIPA Equal Terms Claim
22 Dec 2015, 9:39 pm
Hope Rising Community Church located in Penn Hills, Pennsylvania, is a church organized by Pastor Harry Hoff in 2013. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 7:19 pm
Boca Raton and Burlington Industries v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 12:23 pm
It is ominous because a little over one year ago in the Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Harris v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 3:46 am
A common and recognized mistake resulting in legal malpractice is the double use of an index number. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 5:05 pm
Harris, 973 F. [read post]
17 Jul 2021, 3:18 pm
In Taking Offense v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 9:11 am
Texas, the 2003 US Supreme Court case which decriminalized homosexuality in Texas. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 12:22 pm
In the case of Florida v Harris, (Oral Argument Transcripts) a valid traffic stop for driving with an expired registration tag resulted in a warrantless search of the defendant's truck. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 9:36 am
In Smith v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:18 am
Harris Associates, L.P., read opinion here, the U.S. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:47 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009), in Pliva, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 5:50 pm
Harris v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 1:02 pm
Harris Using Links as Citations Helps Gizmodo Defeat a Defamation Claim–Redmond v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 7:12 am
In Kinik v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 9:01 pm
By contrast, if police took a statement in violation of Miranda, the statement would be inadmissible in the government’s affirmative case but admissible on cross-examination of the defendant, under Harris v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:47 am
Ambrose Harris (Procurator Fiscal), HM Advocate v G : HM Advocate v M [2011] UKSC 43 (6 October 2011) – read judgment Reliance on evidence that emerged from questioning a person without access to a lawyer did not invariably breach the right to a fair trial under Article 6. [read post]
