Search for: "US v. John Davis" Results 601 - 620 of 1,015
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2007, 11:24 am
Marcella McDaniel, et al (NFP) - "William and Anita Sciscoe (collectively the Sciscoes) appeal the trial court's denial of their summary judgment motion in their quiet title action, as well as the grant of summary judgment in favor of Marcella McDaniel, personal representative of the estate of John Davis (the Estate), on the Estate's complaint for foreclosure. *** We affirm. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 2:00 pm by Giles Peaker
This had not been filed and no copy was given to District Judge Davis before or during the hearing. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
There was a three day media law hearing in the Supreme Court this week, with the Daily Mail, the Times and Mirror Group using the Human Rights Act to challenge conditional fee agreements. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 5:00 am
Is this (“Approval Ratings: The Public v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 7:34 am by Amy Howe
” Other commentary on the Court focuses on Friedrichs v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 11:09 am by Amy Howe
” Bivens itself involved “an allegedly unconstitutional arrest and search carried out in New York City,” while Davis v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
(reprinted 2001) (1861) Trayner, John   Law of Blockade, as Contained in the Report of Eight Cases Argued and Determined in the High Court of Admiralty on the Blockade of the Coast of Courland, 1854 1 v. (1855) Deane, James Parker   Law Restated. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
To view the report, please use this link: DOH~49 Grove     [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 8:38 am
Call it Greenhouse v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:13 am by Steve Hall
" "US Supreme Court decision means man who spent 21 years on Ohio's death row will remain free," is the AP filing by John Seewer. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
Please let us know if there are any media and law events which you would like us to list. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
” Yet the Supreme Court, ignoring this rather obvious reality, chose to hold, in Davis v. [read post]