Search for: "United States Court of Federal Claims et al"
Results 601 - 620
of 2,506
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
The Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel, et al., No. 10-10269 (11th Cir. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:57 am
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 12:10 pm
(Andersen, et al. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 12:44 pm
Haaland, et al. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 9:02 pm
" The court stated: The filing of a bankruptcy petition imposes an automatic stay under the United States Bankruptcy Code. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 2:13 am
"
Locke et al. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 12:33 am
United States Metal Refining Co. et al"The court clarifies that its prior order dismissed only that part of plaintiff's claims for declaratory relief based on contribution liability under CERCLA § 113(f) because it is not ripe for adjudication; the claim under § 107(a) is ripe for adjudication. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 9:54 pm
Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 7:25 am
Hetronic Germany GMBH, et al. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 9:03 am
Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America Inc. et al., 1:09-cv-1086 (E.D. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 10:19 am
Corcino & Associates et al., CV 13-3728 GAF (JCx), United States District Court Central District (October 7, 2013). [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:09 am
Scott et al., No. 2:18-cv-00167 (D. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 2:28 pm
New Alien Tort Statute Case At The United States Supreme Court: Kiobel, et al., v Royal Dutch Petroleum Petition Filed In Kiobel, et al., v Royal Dutch Petroleum, et al.,... [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 3:05 am
See Mazza, et al. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 6:48 am
Pecover et al v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Taylor Law amended to clarify an employee organization's duty of fair representation of non-members in a collective bargaining unit Section 209-a.2 of the Civil Service LawIn Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448, the Supreme Court held that "States and public-sector unions may no longer extract agency fees from nonconsenting employees. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Taylor Law amended to clarify an employee organization's duty of fair representation of non-members in a collective bargaining unit Section 209-a.2 of the Civil Service LawIn Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448, the Supreme Court held that "States and public-sector unions may no longer extract agency fees from nonconsenting employees. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 2:14 pm
AndreToday, in Alcazar, et al. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 1:31 pm
(In PHH Corporation et al. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 1:46 pm
GOODSON, et al. [read post]