Search for: "United States v. Bank of the United States" Results 601 - 620 of 6,676
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2011, 2:22 pm
Today, DRI filed an amicus curiae brief in the United States Supreme Court in CompuCredit Corporation and Synovus Bank v. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 5:14 am
Miller and Wellons did not purchase an investment unit. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 7:38 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
The petition of the day is: Loughrin v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The trustees (the Trustees) alleged that Reem Plumbing and Reem Contracting were contractually obligated to contribute to certain union benefit funds (the Funds), as required by four collective bargaining agreements between the Association of Contracting Plumbers of the City of New York and Local Union No. 1 of the United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry of the United States and Canada (id.). [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 6:41 am by Antitrust Today
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California has denied plaintiffs’ motion to reconsider its September 16 2010, ruling that plaintiffs in the ATM Fee Antitrust Litigation have no standing to pursue their price fixing claims against an ATM network and a group of banks. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 1:17 am by Editor
5th.circuit.png In bank and credit card fraud case, while hearsay and double hearsay issues were presented by the introduction of bank computerized printouts reflecting reports of cardholder telephone calls and the statements of cardholders concerning lost, stolen or not received cards, the statements and printouts were admissible under residual hearsay exception based on “equivalent circumstantial guarantees of trustworthiness”, in United… [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 10:28 am
He also made false statements on the applications stating that he owned two fictitious bank accounts. [read post]
7 Nov 2024, 12:15 am
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in Facebook, Inc. v. [read post]