Search for: "United States v. Best et al"
Results 601 - 620
of 995
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2013, 8:46 pm
Accenture, LLP, et al, 2013 WL 764734 (March 1, 2013, 8th Cir.) [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
The CourtStanding to Challenge US Wiretapping Law Denied: Clapper, Director of National Intelligence et al v Amnesty International USA et al On 26 February 2013, the United States Supreme Court (USSC) ((568 US) (2013)) upheld the federal law that enables the government to perform surveillance on Americans’ phone and email communications with people outside the United States. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 9:33 am
Cir. 1994)[xxx] Glenn Tibble et al. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 6:01 am
Genentech, Inc, et al., which was litigated to the Indiana Supreme Court, and the purported broad scope of the Cabilly patents, it seems that litigation regarding these patents may continue for quite some time. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 10:14 am
Leone et al., 2012 ONSC 6237, to little fanfare. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm
Here, Muller et al. have created an excellent book with wide-reaching appeal whose focal point and strength are Bill Manbo's photographs. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 16, 2012 Decided January 22, 2013 No. 11-1265 AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 16, 2012 Decided January 22, 2013 No. 11-1265 AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 11:52 am
In light of the decision in Loving et al v Commissioner where the court ruled that the Internal Revenue Service did not have the authority to regulate tax preparers, the IRS has issued the following statement: As of Friday, Jan. 18, 2013, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia has enjoined the Internal Revenue Service from enforcing the regulatory requirements for registered tax return preparers. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 5:55 am
Further, the United States Supreme Court recently heard arguments in Vance v. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm
Customs and Border Protection] need not demonstrate that the [Chinese and Cypriot] articles are restricted; rather, the [CPIA] statute 'expressly places the burden on importers to prove that they are importable.'"The case of United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm
The case of United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 5:00 am
King-Vassel et al, 2012 U.S. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:44 am
United States, 12-5271, for yesterday’s grant in McQuiggin v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:05 am
Below are observations of the NIMJ volunteer observer at the proceedings in United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 2:06 pm
Below are observations of the NIMJ volunteer observer at the proceedings in United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
Al. vs. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 9:20 am
Renal Care Group, Inc., et al. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:13 am
(ETS), raised capital to grow his coin-operated payphone business by using a network of independent insurance agents to sell payphones to investors throughout the United States for $5,000 to $7,000 per phone. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 6:51 am
Gerald Carlin, et al. v. [read post]
