Search for: "United States v. Close"
Results 601 - 620
of 14,201
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2010, 12:25 pm
Bilski I wrote previously about my uneasiness with the United States Supreme Court’s apparent unfamiliarity with current technology. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 8:51 am
Bilski v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:13 pm
Both Petitioner and Respondent were dual citizens of Turkey and the United States. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 2:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 5:31 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 9:45 am
Petitioner filed this action against Respondent and alleged that Respondent wrongfully retained the children in the United States without Petitioner's consent starting on January 7, 2013. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 5:54 am
Your correspondent returns to Fort Meade, where Lawfare will take in a closed circuit broadcast, from Guantanamo, of pre-trial litigation in United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:56 am
Today marks the first of a possibly three-day, pre-trial motions hearing in the military commission case of United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 5:25 am
The United States Supreme Court affirmed the use of the clear and convincing evidence standard for challenges to the validity of patents last week in a closely watched and eagerly anticipated case, i4i v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 5:43 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 2:37 pm
United States and Nelson v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 7:24 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 12:00 am
One of the most closely-watched cases is Kansas v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 7:56 am
In Lawrence v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 2:30 pm
Some of the best policyholder lawyers in the United States have volunteered considerable time to support United Policyholders Covid Loss Recovery Initiative. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:08 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:09 pm
Lozano v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 8:53 am
Wade is Garza v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 4:30 am
That doctrine comes into play when: (1) the federal plaintiff lost in state court; (2) the plaintiff complains of some injury from the state court judgment; (3) the state court judgment antedated the filing of the federal case; and (4) the plaintiff is inviting the federal court to reject the state court judgment. The plaintiffs appealed that decision to the Third Circuit, and that’s where we are today: Johnson v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 5:17 pm
She also adverted to Alice Corporation v CLS [noted on the IPKat here], to which the other speakers would later refer. [read post]
