Search for: "United States v. Cover"
Results 601 - 620
of 14,076
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2008, 3:54 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit recently held that an employee who allegedly beat a fellow employee with a shovel was not entitled to coverage under the employer’s insurance policy because the incident was not a covered “occurrence,” despite assertion in the answer that the employee had acted in self-defense. [read post]
21 May 2019, 3:46 am
Ct. 2419, 2427 (2015). [3] Oil States Energy Servs., L.L.C. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 2:05 pm
United States (Bad Men Treaty Provision)United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 2:12 am
28 U.S.C § 1498 (a) (Governmental Use) The United States (U.S.) does not have any provisions for a compulsory license. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 9:36 pm
§ 1498(a) The statute states:Whenever an invention described in and covered by a patent of the United States is used or manufactured by or for the United States . . . the owner’s remedy shall be by action against the United States in the United States Court of Federal Claims . . . .28 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:50 am
Yesterday’s second argument was in United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 6:34 am
McCoy have published an alert about the United States Supreme Court’s unanimous ruling narrowing the class of would-be whistleblowers under the Dodd-Frank Act. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 11:13 am
The case is State v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:14 pm
In adopting the Shield Law, New Jersey’s Legislature accepted an invitation by the United States Supreme Court in Branzburg v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 10:30 am
Newmont USA Limited v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 9:52 am
., LTD. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 10:56 am
In Roland v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:00 am
The United States of America, 08-CV-2785. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 5:58 am
Section 3500(b), part of the Jencks Act, provides that After a witness called by the United States has testified on direct examination, the court shall, on motion of the defendant, order the United States to produce any statement... [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:31 pm
” The United States Patent and Trademark Office has released its 2012 Interim Procedure for Subject Matter Patentability Analysis of Process Claims Involving Laws of Nature. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 3:00 am
United States. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 5:16 pm
Last month I commenced a series of posts of the United States Supreme Court’s labor and employment law decisions last term by blogging on the Court’s decision in the First Amendment public employee free speech case of Lane v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 12:21 pm
In United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 12:32 pm
United States, one of the long-pending cases on whether the Fourth Amendment protects government access to historical cell-site records. [read post]
