Search for: "United States v. Dakota" Results 601 - 620 of 1,122
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2016, 8:23 pm by Kate Howard
North Dakota and the state’s connection to the corporation that accepts the order and arranges the sale, or whether such a tax violates both the due process clause and dormant commerce clause of the United States Constitution by imposing a sales tax on the out-of-state transfer of tangible personal property. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 3:00 pm by Jon Katz
Plenty of trial and appellate judges likely do not take kindly to the United States Supreme Court decisions in Missouri v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 5:57 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
And the list that the Direct Marketing Association (DMA) was hoping to end up on didn’t belong to Santa but to SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the United States). [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 9:03 am by MBettman
North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298 (1992) (considered substantial nexus for purposes of the state’s use tax (a functional equivalent to the sales tax). [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 8:49 pm by Cymie Payne
After the treaties were abrogated by the United States, 9 smaller reservations remain, located in North Dakota and South Dakota, including those of the three petitioners. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 7:23 am by Paul Rosenzweig
  Such legislation would almost certainly pass constitutional muster: Under South Dakota v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:54 am by Kelly Buchanan
A Māori lawyer working in South Dakota who has been observing the protest was featured in several news items in New Zealand. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 5:14 am by Patricia Salkin
The City of Fargo appealed under the equal protection clauses of the North Dakota and United States Constitutions. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 8:07 pm by Jon Katz
The United States Supreme Court does no good when its opinions provides more dicta than needed. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
“Denial“, a film based on Deborah Lipstadt’s book of the 2000 libel trial, Irving v Penguin Books and Lipstadt (see Gray J’s judgment, [2000] EWHC 115 (QB))  has been released in the United States. [read post]