Search for: "United States v. Diaz-Diaz"
Results 601 - 620
of 641
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2024, 8:17 am
§ 1326 makes it a crime to re-enter the United States after having been removed, deported, or denied entry. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:03 am
Issuers Targeted in Securities Class Action Lawsuits Filed in the United States Posted by David H. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 2:18 pm
Diaz v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Rodriguez-Amaya, No. 06-4514 Conviction for unlawful reentry after deportation by an aggravated felon is affirmed where the time defendant was detained by United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement on administrative charges pending his removal was not detention "in connection with" his arrest, thus defendant's indictment did not violate the Speedy Trial Act. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 2:04 pm
In Schroer v. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 3:33 pm
Nov. 18, 2019) has a take on mooting website accessibility claim that considers Diaz v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 8:58 am
An informant reported to a drug unit officer that he had twice bought $100 worth of marijuana from the plaintiff. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:48 pm
In 2017, in United States Telecom Association v. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm
After Diaz filed the lawsuit, the University filed a petition to cancel the Diaz trademark with the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 11:29 pm
Wynn Oil Co., 653 F.2d 1273, 1276 (9th Cir. 1981) ("stereotypic impressions of male and female roles do not qualify gender as a [bona fide occupational qualification]"); Diaz v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 2:18 pm
Diaz v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
" U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, January 25, 2008 Diaz v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm
Diaz v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:41 am
As the United States Supreme Court (“SCOTUS”) explains in United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am
At every level of government in the United States (and often in other countries), there are laws that empower the public to file requests for public records. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 7:04 pm
FEC and Austin v. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 12:59 am
http://j.st/qnJ Diaz, et al. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 5:26 am
That’s also how that canceled check ended as a primary exhibit in the case of State of Texas v. [read post]
2 May 2007, 2:06 am
DeFRANCISCO, ADAMS, ALESI, BONACIC, BRESLIN, BRUNO, CONNOR, DIAZ, DILAN, DUANE, FARLEY, FLANAGAN, FUSCHILLO, GOLDEN, GONZALEZ, … [read post]
