Search for: "United States v. Gates"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,118
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2013, 7:19 pm
United States, Berghuis v. [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 11:33 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 2:58 am
Tough questions greeted counsel for both sides of this case—a seemingly mundane dispute about playgrounds and tire scraps that has potentially wide-ranging implications for the contours of religious liberty in the United States. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 10:51 am
Georgia attorneys including future United States District Judge Horace T. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
United Illuminating, 1998 WL 910271, at *10 (Conn. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 10:32 am
The grant was not finalized by the time war broke out between Mexico and the United States in 1848. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 10:11 am
Vance Spath placed the United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 9:30 pm
Microsoft, in which my former boss, David Boies, is often credited with winning the case for the United States government. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 8:52 am
ISP Technologies, Inc., 259 F.3d 924, 929 (8th Cir. 2001) (emphasis added), but “[t]here is less need for the gatekeeper to keep the gate when the gatekeeper is keeping the gate only for himself,” United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 6:02 am
PharmaStem Therapeutics, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 8:00 am
When the United States Olympic Committee (USOC) announced Chicago would be the country's bid city for the 2016 Olympic Games, Chicago's political and business leaders rejoiced in their joint victory.[1] Nearly a year after Chicago Mayor Richard Daley formed the Olympic exploratory committee, and nine months after being named one of the U.S. finalists, the USOC threw its support behind the bid city that has quickly achieved front-runner… [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 7:01 am
(relisted after the February 16, February 23, March 2, March 16 and March 23 conferences) Gates v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 8:39 am
Fortunately, this monstrosity never made it past the starting gate. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 6:15 am
V. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 1:35 pm
United States, 593 U.S. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 8:13 pm
“This motion [for contempt] is not about habeas relief, or whether the district court properly can order Parhat released into the United States. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 7:51 am
In United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 6:01 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Jerald Anthony Minzey v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 5:09 am
At issue was the interpretation of the indenture's "Public Acquirer Change of Control" definition, which depends in relevant part on whether: "a Person who ... acquires the Company ... has a class of common stock traded on a United States national securities exchange or the Nasdaq National Market. [read post]
