Search for: "United States v. General Dynamics"
Results 601 - 620
of 975
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2013, 6:31 am
Picerni v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 6:04 am
Chicago Dynamic Industries, et al. - testament to strength of patents in the video game industry (Patent Arcade) The importance of the written description requirement: Anascape v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 7:47 pm
I have suggested otherwise, positing that it is necessary to move away from state-focused legal paradigms, redolent with hierarchy and order, and to embrace ἄναρχος (anarxos), an aggregation of systems without rulers, but with an order quite distinct from the late feudalism of the law- state system embedded within it.9 I have previously written10 that what I call global law, the law of non-state governance systems, can be… [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 5:51 am
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2017) On the eve of the November 2017 meeting between the leaders of the United States and China, "John F. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 10:35 am
See also Id. at 42 n. 27 (rejecting as "unpersuasive" an argument "that we should not adopt the learned intermediary doctrine because the fundamental basis for the doctrine has changed with the evolving dynamics of contemporary society and the developing system of healthcare in the United States"). [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 8:38 am
As a general manager, Adams was responsible for the overall performance of the business unit, such as scheduling, and handling certain customer accounts. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:23 am
United States – Supreme Court Opinion (SCOTUS opinion) Victory! [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:19 am
Within these techno-bureaucracies administrators articulate norms and objectives which are translated by coders into generative systems that then undertake their development and application. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 5:17 am
By contrast, the Judicial Conference of the United States, which is principally responsible for making policies for the administration of federal courts, has generally moved in the opposite direction from the states. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:53 am
In 1990, Asma Jahangir successfully represented Darshan Masih in a landmark case regarding bonded labor (Darshan Masih v the State, PLD 1990 SC 513). [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:22 am
Bynum, Brief for the United States 2008 WL 4974084. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 8:11 am
ECHR (see more here), or with the Canadian Supreme Court's equally flawed discussion and reliance on the general international law concepts of jurisdiction to prescribe and enforce in R v. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
(1709 Copyright Blog) Three-strikes petition gets attention of 10 Downing Street (Ars Technica) Bridging the physical/digital divide – Jurisdiction over online content: EWCA decision in R v Sheppard (IP Osgoode) Newzbin vs MPA Usenet ‘Filtering’ trial concludes (TorrentFreak) Lord Clement Jones: Anti-piracy lawyers ‘an embarrassment to creative rights industry’ (TorrentFreak) United States US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps… [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
(1709 Copyright Blog) Three-strikes petition gets attention of 10 Downing Street (Ars Technica) Bridging the physical/digital divide – Jurisdiction over online content: EWCA decision in R v Sheppard (IP Osgoode) Newzbin vs MPA Usenet ‘Filtering’ trial concludes (TorrentFreak) Lord Clement Jones: Anti-piracy lawyers ‘an embarrassment to creative rights industry’ (TorrentFreak) United States US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps… [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
As a consequence, the United States Supreme Court has refused to provide advisory opinions since 1793. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:55 pm
The committee will hear testimony from David Hale, the undersecretary of state for political affairs. [read post]
29 Sep 2024, 12:25 am
Speaking at the United Nations last Sunday, Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama said that the sovereign state would promote moderation, tolerance and peaceful coexistence. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 11:47 pm
But in Biden v. [read post]
27 May 2020, 8:29 am
State Bar of Wisconsin, 19-831Issue: Whether Lathrop v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
”[15] The purpose of a restatement is to clarify “the underlying principles of the common law” that have “become obscured by the ever-growing mass of decisions in the many different jurisdictions, state and federal, within the United States. [read post]
