Search for: "United States v. Harris"
Results 601 - 620
of 2,750
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2019, 10:36 am
In Jones, the court stated: Neither Mr. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 5:35 am
The Supreme Court upheld the Hyde Amendment in Harris v. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 10:03 pm
(See Grimshaw v. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 7:40 am
Harris, No. 11-817, and Florida v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 11:13 am
Finally, in June, the court declined to review Alabama’s law banning abortions in which the fetal body is dismembered for extraction, in Harris v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 2:55 pm
This statute is for temporary restraining orders or preliminary injunctions to enjoin emergency proclamations which are necessarily very quick, harried court reviews of a case's circumstances. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 2:55 pm
This statute is for temporary restraining orders or preliminary injunctions to enjoin emergency proclamations which are necessarily very quick, harried court reviews of a case's circumstances. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 4:29 am
Kopf Senior United States District Judge (Nebraska) [i] I intend no comment on pending or impending matters that are before me. [read post]
20 Jul 2019, 5:30 am
Jacques Singer-Emery and Patrick McDonnell assessed recent developments at the military commission in United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
In Rucho v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 8:40 am
United States (meaning of “use”) and Muscarello v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 8:40 am
United States (meaning of “use”) and Muscarello v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 8:40 am
United States (meaning of “use”) and Muscarello v. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 7:04 am
District Court for the District of Columbia’s ruling in United States of America v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 11:01 am
District Court for the District of Columbia’s ruling in United States of America v. [read post]
6 Jul 2019, 6:11 am
Hadley Baker shared appellate briefs from both parties in Trump v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
United States—flew under the radar perhaps because it was decided narrowly; the Court upheld the discretion enjoyed by the U.S. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 11:58 am
Aurelius Investment, United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 1:35 pm
United States, which held that federal criminal asset forfeiture statutes are “limited to property the defendant himself actually acquired as the result of the crime. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 7:32 am
But I also believe, and it's personal -- and I was actually very -- it was hurtful to hear you talk about the reputations of two United States senators who built their reputations and career on the segregation of race in this country. [read post]
