Search for: "United States v. Hernandez"
Results 601 - 620
of 673
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2008, 2:22 pm
Grissom v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 2:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 4:43 pm
See United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
When the United States Supreme Court addressed this problem with regard to claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 4:08 am
See United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 6:24 am
When the United States Supreme Court addressed this problem with regard to claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. [read post]
5 May 2008, 9:24 am
In UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 4:30 am
EVIDENCEUnited States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 6:13 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 8:40 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 4:21 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 9:00 pm
Once a person becomes a Supreme Court justice, no concern should exist about being pleasing enough to senators and the president to get onto a higher court (and getting elevated to a higher court or retained on the existing court, when it comes to some state courts, should not be a concern with any judge on any court); this is the highest court the United States ever has had. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 9:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 7:51 am
Arnold District Court Decision: Recoiling Against Romm In United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 1:18 pm
United States and Carabell v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 12:20 pm
United States, No. 07-955, the sub-jurisdictional case we previously discussed here, here, and here; and 2) Hernandez v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
"[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of this chapter shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 12:05 pm
It appeared in Colored Men and Hombres Aqui, Hernandez v. [read post]
