Search for: "United States v. Hernandez-Hernandez"
Results 601 - 620
of 678
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2019, 10:36 am
In Jones, the court stated: Neither Mr. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 2:14 pm
For instance, the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and article I, section 9 of the Texas Constitution both protect against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 2:19 am
To the extent there's a saving grace, it's that even border searches must be reasonable, though up to now, the operative law treats computers like any other sealed container and considers a search of a laptop to be routine, per the 1985 Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 9:37 am
United States (finding a contract based on a mistake of fact is voidable); Hernandez v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 1:39 pm
” The majority cited the Supreme Court’s 2003 opinion in Raytheon Co v Hernandez in support. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:16 am
” The facts of Irvin v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 1:30 pm
United States lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act & Daniel Hernandez Congressional Intern for Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords Thursday, June 16th 5:30 pm Arrive Early. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
Hernandez, 315 S.W.3d 1 (Tex. 2010). [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 6:03 pm
United States Steel Corp., 571 U.S. 220, 227 (2014) (citation omitted). [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 9:35 am
In support of that assertion, the State cites United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 10:11 am
Hernández v. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 7:03 am
’” Quoting United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:03 pm
Areli Escobar was convicted in Texas state court of the sexual assault and murder of Biana Maldonado Hernandez and sentenced to death. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 12:44 pm
’” Commonwealth v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:49 pm
Category: Civil Procedure By: Jesus Hernandez, Blog Editor/Contributor TitleLighting Ballast Control, LLC v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Horn, No. 03-9010, 03-9011 In a capital-murder case, petition for a writ of habeas corpus is granted where: 1) the time period for filing the petition was tolled during state-court proceedings, and the federal petition was therefore timely; 2) the state fugitive-forfeiture rule did not apply to procedurally default the petition; 3) the jury instructions and verdict sheet that were used during the penalty phase of petitioner's trial denied him due process of law pursuant to… [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 10:03 pm
United States Patent and Trademark Office, 653 F.3d 1329 (Fed. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 12:14 pm
” United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:59 am
In United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
"[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of this chapter shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
