Search for: "United States v. House of Representatives of United States"
Results 601 - 620
of 4,270
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2022, 11:10 am
Their State Abortion Laws in the Absence of Roe v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 9:17 am
Court of Appeals this week found in United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 6:46 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 12:45 pm
In United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
Findley later served in House of Representatives and was the chairman of [a committee that] made a report to the House in the contested election case of John Hoge of Pennsylvania. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
George Washington took office under a United States flag with thirteen stars and stripes.[6] While not represented in the new Congress, the two were part of the United States. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 11:36 am
At stake are all 435 seats in the House of Representatives, 36 Senate spots, 36 governorships, dozens of ballot measures and approximately 6,000 state legislator posts. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 1:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
Kelo v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 6:24 am
United States, which threw] into doubt his 2006 conviction for fraud and conspiracy. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 5:32 am
In Fix v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 6:05 am
The case, Dada v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
The constitutional importance of this point is clear: in R (on the application of Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, which was cited by Lord Pannick on behalf of Gina Miller during his oral submissions, Lord Hoffmann held that ‘the unique authority Parliament derives from its representative character’. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 10:14 am
Republicans in the House of Representatives passed dozens of attempted repeals of the Act, even if these were largely symbolic. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 3:48 pm
Because of its unique role, the United States Supreme Court has less need to look at fifty-state surveys. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 8:55 am
The United States Constitution protects unenumerated rights. [read post]
22 May 2007, 3:39 am
See United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 6:21 am
FEC, 518 U.S. 604, 614 (1996); and even corporations, Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:46 pm
This was said to infringe the act of state doctrine, as explained in decisions such as that of the United States Supreme Court in Underhill v Hernandez 168 US 250 (1897) and the House of Lords in Buttes Gas and Oil Co v Hammer [1982] AC 888. [read post]
