Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 601 - 620 of 10,388
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2010, 6:45 am by The Docket Navigator
In prosecuting this claim for relief, TriPharma is acting on behalf of the United States of America and is entitled to receive 50% of the damages.Tripharma LLC v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 5:37 am by INFORRM
This week was marked be partial re-openings across all states, more details of which can be found on the CNN website. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:59 am by INFORRM
” The judge clearly had regard to Ms Ntuli’s stated motives for wanting to sell her story (see, for example, paragraph 32 of his judgment). [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:51 pm
Section 1498(b) of title 28, United States Code, contains the waiver of immunity for copyright infringement. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 3:04 am
The article reports the results of a "systematic empirical study of how the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) has applied the immoral-or-scandalous prohibition in practice. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 5:58 am
Applicant, United Trademark Holdings, Inc., filed for registration of the mark RAPUNZEL for dolls and toy figures. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 8:32 am
” for vehicles, ruling on summary judgment that Winkelmann had failed to establish the requisite bona fide intent to use his mark in the United States. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 12:39 pm
Chicago, Illinois - The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed the ruling of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Western Division in the matter of Sorenson v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 7:48 am
This phrase, as well as its accompanying ‘Walking Fingers’ logo, are registered trade marks in many countries around the world, including the UK, Canada, and Australia – though curiously not the United States. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 6:35 pm by Jim Chen
In a forum that has taken pains to praise United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 12:39 am
In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Mark Munizzi, Claimant, v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 5:59 am by jcarnicella
§ 292, was unconstitutional under the Take Care Clause in Article II of the United States Constitution. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 1:28 pm
On September 11, 2009, the United States District Court, Eastern District of California, issued a substantial class certification opinion in Cartwright, et al. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:48 pm
The title of the article is The Quiet Coup, and it's introductory paragraph changed my whole year… The crash has laid bare many unpleasant truths about the United States. [read post]