Search for: "United States v. Starks" Results 601 - 620 of 816
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2020, 5:33 am by Matthew Waxman, Samuel Weitzman
” In so doing, Roosevelt justified his actions “by virtue of the power and authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, as President of the United States and Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States[.] [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 2:11 pm by familoo
On the one hand, we have the European Convention on Human Rights, which is directly applicable in the United Kingdom, but is largely confined to negative rights (to be free from interference), some of which have been interpreted as having a positive component requiring the State to protect us from each other. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 1:47 am by Kevin LaCroix
 A ruling by the United States Supreme Court near the end of the savings and loan litigation, however, has reopened the door to these defenses. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 8:03 am by Courtney Hostetler
Moreover, if U.S. law enforcement begins carrying out broad searches of computers located outside the United States, these practices may well invite other countries to authorize similarly unfettered, broad hacking of computers located in foreign countries, including the United States. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 4:00 pm
While punitives are "higher and more frequent in the United States" than anywhere else in the world, such awards suffer from "stark unpredictability" and often dwarf the compensatory damages granted in a case. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 6:52 pm
The United States has the programs to deny trade benefits. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
” At Medium, Nick Lum points out that the South Dakota attorney general, who represented the state in South Dakota v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:58 am by Eugene Volokh
From Wednesday's California Court of Appeal decision in Firefighters4Freedom v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 4:32 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In response to these stories as well as subsequent media reports, the company issued statements denying the news reports and stating that all Eletrobras units and employees respect the principles in the company’s code of ethics. [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:30 pm by CAPTAIN
In 1954, the United States Supreme Court ordered the public schools desegregated "with all deliberate speed" by 1956 in Brown v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 3:36 am by SHG
Adam Liptak, in his Sidebar column, writes about Todd Crespi, an artist whose carved out a niche at the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 4:02 am
§ 1679, et seq., prohibits provisions that purport to waive a consumer's right to sue in court for CROA violations.Pregnant welder sues employer for discriminationRoetzel & AndressOn August 10, 2010, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals issued its decision in Spees v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 8:40 am by Lyle Denniston
United States comes up for one hour of argument. [read post]