Search for: "United States v. Taylor"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,562
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm
Steven Spielberg et al., No. 08 Civ. 7810 United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:00 am
FTC https://t.co/gNoMxRzqR4 -> Target Facebook: Is the Social Network Joining the “DMCA License” Group https://t.co/2FTeFa9uTD -> Game Over: Nintendo Takes Down “Full Screen Mario” Code https://t.co/qJ3kKcc3Qy -> Court Orders Pirate Bay Domains to be Forfeited to the State https://t.co/lEtO5YLXDU -> Kate Taylor: Should the law protect original research? [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 4:50 am
State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 2:01 pm
"Beautiful use of historical citation by Justice Neil Gorsuch, writing for the plurality in United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:54 am
United States (1990) and James v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 5:16 am
Gene Taylor of Mississippi. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Both served as Assistant United States Attorneys and as high-level aides to Attorneys General. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 3:53 am
Although not identified as an issue in the Richfield Springs case, as the Appellate Division, Second Department noted in Port Washington USFD v Port Washington Teachers Association, 268 AD2d 523, [motion for leave to appeal denied, 95 NY2d 761], a statute, decisional law or public policy may preclude referring a Taylor Law contract dispute to arbitration.In Port Washington, the parties agreed to include a specific religious holiday provision in a Taylor Law agreement. [read post]
4 May 2010, 1:30 pm
Taylor, 520 F.3d 746 (7th Cir. 2008); United States v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 2:43 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
25 Dec 2013, 9:59 pm
(Orin Kerr) A recent case, United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 11:15 am
Court rules that the appointing authority made its appointments consistent with the requirements of Section 61.1 of the Civil Service LawMatter of Cherry v New York State Civ. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 11:37 am
Taylor, 529 U.S. 420, 432 (2000). [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 10:50 am
United States, 469 U.S. 38 (1984). [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 11:09 am
On September 9, 2015, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled that Costco was willfully infringing Tiffany & Co. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 10:32 am
United States — duty of federal prosecutors to prove the interstate-commerce connection of a charge under the Hobbs Act Halo Electronics v. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 4:30 am
On Tuesday, December 5, the Court will hear argument in United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 3:03 pm
United States, 495 U.S. 575 (1990) and extended it to convictions by guilty pleas in Shepard v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm
Co. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm
Co. v. [read post]
