Search for: "United States v. Vague" Results 601 - 620 of 2,879
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2022, 10:26 am by Daniel Harawa
Congress amended ACCA to include the clause in order to ensconce the solicitor general’s position in United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 12:10 am by Orin Kerr
Reading through the briefing in the case, I was struck by the surprising argument advanced by the state of California and (to some extent) by the United States. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 8:41 pm
Patent 7,603,690 (the “’690 patent”) [both owned by United Video Properties] by the United States District Court for the District of Delaware following claim construction. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 11:00 am by Wells Bennett
 The two other judges, gauging by their questions, expressed at least some agreement with Hentif or a measure of disagreement with the United States. [read post]
13 May 2014, 1:08 pm
” Three federal judges have already found this statute unconstitutional (see Vives v the City of New York, 305 F Supp 2d 289, 299 [SD NY 2003, Scheindlin, J.], revd on other grounds 405 F3d 115 [2d Cir 2004] ["where speech is regulated or proscribed based on its content, the scope of the effected speech must be clearly defined"]; see also Vives 405 F3d 115, 123-124 [2d Cir 2004, Cardamone, J., dissenting in part, concurring in part] [Penal Law § 240.30(1)… [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 9:08 pm by Patricia Salkin
The United States District Court for the District of Connecticut granted Keeper’s motion for summary judgement and the City appealed. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
According to that court, an undocumented immigrant’s continued presence in the United States does not itself involve “moral turpitude. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 5:01 am
United States, 521 U.S. 898, 117 S.Ct. 2365, 138 L.Ed.2d 914 (1997), and New York v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 6:27 am by John Elwood
United States, 21-5967Issue: Whether Zenon Grzegorczyk is entitled to relief on his claim that knowingly using a facility of interstate commerce with intent that a murder be committed, in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
The Supreme Court’s decision in Sackett v EPA, announced on May 25, 2023, was unanimous in that the EPA’s wetlands regulatory jurisdiction is limited to wetlands with a continuous surface connection to the waters of the United States. [read post]