Search for: "Unknown Persons Having Interests"
Results 601 - 620
of 3,856
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2009, 5:04 am
This "cultural deference" argument was not based on mere diplomatic considerations - as such it would not have passed muster under the New York Convention, which requires the interest of the child (not of governments) to be paramount - but was formulated in the name of the superior interest of the child. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 2:42 pm
A technique’s usefulness for law enforcement does not outweigh people’s privacy interests in their genetic data. [read post]
27 May 2014, 3:33 am
Harris relied upon Henderson v Henderson to argue that any claims against him personally should have been brought along with the original copyright infringement action against Newzbin. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 5:59 am
Further, they alleged that SCPA 2103 did not permit an unbridled search for unknown and unidentified assets based on nothing more than a surmise and a possibility that the Decedent may have owned those assets. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 5:59 am
Further, they alleged that SCPA 2103 did not permit an unbridled search for unknown and unidentified assets based on nothing more than a surmise and a possibility that the Decedent may have owned those assets. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 5:36 pm
In appropriate circumstances this includes consideration of the Article 10 rights of anyone, party or not, who would be restrained from publishing the specified category of information (X v Persons Unknown [2009] EMLR 290). [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 5:01 am
The agencies' respective querying procedures and the NSA’s targeting procedures have been revised to include the same requirements. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 5:10 am
All the accouterments, from the socialism to the intersectionality, is either unknown, unrecognized or sloughed off as just some crazy crap at the outer fringes of no relevance to any sane person. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 12:26 pm
In doing so they cited the Texas Business Organizations Code, which provides that "a person acquiring property described by this section may not be held responsible or liable for a liability or obligation of the transferring domestic entity that is not expressly assumed by the person. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 2:55 am
Stivers echoed that sentiment: “We have the opportunity to advance our society in so many exciting and unknown ways, and we need to ensure we have a patent system that encourages that kind of game-changing innovation, instead of stifling it. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 11:58 pm
Always view the property in person before paying over any money. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 2:13 pm
Indiana may have a case too. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 4:15 pm
Even if the newspapers believe that the Judge was wrong about that, any limited public interest in the story must have surely waned with the passage of time, to the extent that any reasonable data controller ought not believe that ongoing publication (which constitutes a form of processing) remains in the public interest. [read post]
30 Mar 2019, 8:31 am
From the CDC NORS dataset: https://wwwn.cdc.gov/norsdashboard/ Year State Transmission Serotype Setting Illnesses 2000 Washington Food O103 Caterer (food prepared off-site from where served); Other 18 2010 Minnesota Food O103:H2; O145:NM School/college/university 29 2011 Wisconsin Animal Contact O103; O157:H7 6 2013 Minnesota Person-to-person O103 Child day care 3 2013 Pennsylvania Indeterminate O103:H2 Private home/residence 2 2014 Ohio Indeterminate O103 Child day care 3… [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 10:33 am
The plaintiffs responded that they have “quasi-sovereign” interests in limiting immigration and attendant expenditures. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 11:13 pm
“Love is one of those topics that interests people universally, and, of course, that means that cybercriminals are also there. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 3:41 am
This picture was then modified by an unknown third person, who added UFOs to the picture that appear to be flying above the building. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 9:06 am
The Public Advocate would have all necessary security clearances, and his or her work would remain unknown to the persons potentially under surveillance. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 11:00 am
Since trade secrets often comprise the legitimate business interest supporting a non-compete claim, a plaintiff will have every incentive to load into a non-compete dispute a corresponding trade secret claim just to get into federal court. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 8:44 am
What kind of person buys something like that? [read post]
