Search for: "V Force Customs, Inc." Results 601 - 620 of 1,503
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2017, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
(Oxford University Press, 2008), page 2] In Canada, the prohibition against lawyers being employed to provide services to the customers of their employers[ii] can be overcome by a Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms “public freedom for access to the courts” argument based upon s. 2(b)’s, “freedom of opinion and expression”; see: Re Southam Inc. and The Queen (No. 1), 1983 CanLII 1707 (ONCA), 41 O.R. (2d) 113; plus an extended use of, Endean… [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
 The claim against the first defendant, Google Inc, continues. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 11:52 am
Paradoxically, perhaps, the project of legalization evidences how a love of ancient custom, in this case the customs and patterns of the post-Westphalian law-state, remains, while power shifts to those, enterprises included, that have brought about a revolution in the state and in the meaning of legalization in a new world order that has yet to be revealed. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 9:00 am by Sarah Tate Chambers
  Harkening Back to Microsoft’s Monopoly Sending us back to the release of Microsoft 95, Judge Gorsuch’s opinion in Novell Inc., v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 9:07 pm by News Desk
ABC aired reports calling the product “pink slime” and saying it was not safe, nutritious or even beef, BPI was forced to close production facilities and lay-off employees after losing major restaurant and retail customers who were using the product to add to their own ground beef products. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 7:33 am by Ronald Mann
The first week, they will review Impression Products, Inc. v Lexmark Int’l, Inc., which also presents a momentous transactional question: When a firm holding a patent sells a product to which the patent applies, does the sale necessarily “exhaust” its rights to enforce the patent as to that product? [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc v Lomas & Ors and other cases, heard 17-20 October 2016. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 8:49 am by Jan von Hein
He discusses two problems of assimilation resulting from such a classification considering how the instrument of assimilation has to be handled after the regulation came into force. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 3:00 am by Barry Sookman
No breach of restrictive covenant in Nlogic Inc. v Microtherapy Inc., 2017 ONSC 722 https://t.co/3H9kXUraHm -> CASL Workshop: Preparing Yourself for the Private Right of Action Coming in July https://t.co/R9bIrgUq6n -> Google, Waze Reach Deal In GPS App Maker's Copyright Suit https://t.co/hbFcf402v7 -> Cartier: UK Supreme Court will hear appeal re costs of intermediary injunctions but not rest of issues https://t.co/mfye8Tlx47 -> Chinese pirates are facing… [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 3:08 pm by Lorene Park
One supervisor allegedly responded that “the customers come first” (Zimmerman v. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc v Lomas & Ors and other cases, heard 17-20 October 2016. [read post]