Search for: "Washington v. Barnes"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,034
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2007, 1:33 pm
" Robert Barnes of The Washington Post has a news update headlined "Supreme Court Weighs Federal Sentencing Guidelines. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 4:21 am
Tam comes from Robert Barnes in The Washington Post, who remarks on the “contradictions” that abound in the case, observing that although “a victory for the Slants would be a godsend for the Washington Redskins, whose legal battle to hold on to its revoked trademark has been put on hold pending the outcome,” the “band members abhor the Washington nickname and wince when the team’s fate is linked to their own. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 6:30 am
Greg Stohr of Bloomberg also has coverage, as do Nina Totenberg at NPR’s The Two-Way blog, Mike Sacks of the Huffington Post, Robert Barnes of the Washington Post, Adam Liptak of the New York Times, Mark Sherman of the Associated Press, James Vicini of Reuters, Marcia Coyle of the National Law Journal (via the Blog of Legal Times), Nicole Flatow of ACSblog, Jess Bravin of the Wall Street Journal (subscription required), and Jaclyn Belczyk of JURIST. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:21 am
Lyle Denniston covered the decision for this blog; other coverage comes from Ruthann Robson at Constitutional Law Prof Blog, who focuses on Justice Ginsburg’s concurring opinion in the case and the prospect that Apel could still have a First Amendment claim, Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal, and Robert Barnes of The Washington Post. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 3:40 am
” For The Washington Post (subscription required), Robert Barnes reports that “[t]he … deeply divided order … still provides a guide for lower courts balancing government rules intended to preserve public health with parishioners’ constitutional religious rights. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 3:55 am
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 5:41 am
“Most women take the pills that end a pregnancy in its early stages at home,” the Washington Post’s Robert Barnes reports, “and U.S. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:57 am
In North Carolina v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 3:38 am
” Additional coverage of yesterday’s orders comes from Robert Barnes in The Washington Post. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 3:55 am
” For The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that “Kavanaugh has made good on his pledge to hire women to serve as his law clerks, becoming the first justice to have an all-female staff. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 10:40 am
The Washington Post’s Robert Barnes and David Savage of the Los Angeles Times both have coverage of the Court’s decision in Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 12:36 pm
Commentary comes from Robert Bauer in an op-ed for The Washington Post; Petula Dvorak, also in The Washington Post; Tim Lynch at Cato at Liberty; and Robert Weisberg at Legal Aggregate; At The Trace, Olivia Li discusses Monday’s ruling in Voisine v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:26 am
” For The Washington Post, Robert Barnes observes that “similar to a debate that has consumed Washington for the past 15 months, a major issue for the court is separating ‘the president’ from ‘this president. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 7:08 am
In today’s edition of The Washington Post, Robert Barnes has an article headlined “Supreme Court seems wary of bold pronouncements in student speech case. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:35 am
Robert Barnes at the Washington Post, David Savage and Ben Fritz at the L.A. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 8:00 pm
Robert Barnes has this article on the two cases for the Washington Post. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 1:16 pm
Yesterday, WBUR's "Here and Now" had this audio segment with SCOTUSblog's own Lyle Denniston on the Court's decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 3:54 am
” Briefly: Robert Barnes writes for The Washington Post that “[r]evivals of allegations against [Justice Brett] Kavanaugh roil the White House, Capitol Hill and the Democratic presidential nomination trail,” but “at the Supreme Court, once you’re in, you’re in. [read post]
19 May 2020, 4:05 am
Yesterday the court issued a unanimous opinion in Opati v. [read post]
